Many of you will be familiar with the revolution that the internet is undergoing, with its growth of social networking, web applications, blogs and wikis. What I had not appreciated, until very recently, is what the full implications are for how we go about our research. I am sure that colleagues in DEC and the MediaSchoolare well ahead of the curve on this, but for the rest of us, the penny is perhaps only just beginning to drop. I recently attended a fascinating conference hosted by the European Social Simulation Association in Salzburg. This is a group of researchers united by a common interest in using computer programs to simulate human behaviour, and its implications for human society. This was very much a new arena for me; I was really attending to learn something about the agent-based modelling approaches that are the flavour of the month in these circles. But what most impressed me was the way researchers are now using web technologies to access data to explore in their models. For example, although I’d heard of “crowdsourcing” before, I’d never really seen it in practice, and what it can deliver. I was most impressed by groups using tools such as Twitter, together with mapping applications such as Google maps, to produce highly informative maps showing the movements and wellbeing of large numbers of people. A great example is what the LSE is doing to map happiness – yes, really – http://www.mappiness.org.uk/. Another example, from the University of Leeds, has been using Twitter to map the movements of commuters in and out of the city. What is perhaps most astonishing is that large numbers of people seem keen to participate in these research projects. Potentially useful tools being used by this research community include open source mapping initiatives such as Open Street Map http://www.openstreetmap.org/ and Maptube http://www.maptube.org/, as well as Survey mapper http://www.surveymapper.com/current.aspx. You might find this reference useful if you’re interested in learning more – http://ssc.sagepub.com/content/27/4/524
3 Responses to “How Web 2.0 might revolutionise our research”
BU staff can login below:
Don’t miss a post!
Subscribe for the BU Research Digest, delivered freshly every day.
Recent posts
BU research Funding opportunities EU
- BU-Lush Cosmetics Ltd collaboration to Develop Renewable Zero Carbon Emissions Energy Technology21 February 2025
Three Minute Thesis (3MT®) Competition21 February 2025
- Dorset Community Foundation have launched the latest version of the Hidden Dorset report as a website20 February 2025
C.A.I.R.E.E.S. Conference: Harnessing AI for a sustainable future19 February 2025
Writing for The Conversation interactive workshop – Wednesday 5th March19 February 2025
Congratulations on new paper by BU PhD graduate19 February 2025
- BA/Leverhulme Small Research Grants June 2025 round20 February 2025
Update on UKRO services13 February 2025
- BA/Leverhulme Small Research Grants June 2025 round5 February 2025
- Horizon Europe funding – Weds 12th Feb21 January 2025
- BU ECRN Funding call NOW OPEN15 January 2025
- Cohort-based bidding approach- AHRC Catalyst13 January 2025
Update on UKRO services13 February 2025
European research project exploring use of ‘virtual twins’ to better manage metabolic associated fatty liver disease4 February 2025
- Horizon Europe funding – Weds 12th Feb21 January 2025
- BU research to explore how artificial intelligence can help detect and investigate crime13 January 2025
BU Professor has been invited to a series of plenary and invited lectures.5 May 2024
- International midwifery collaboration on early labour26 March 2024
Search by Category
Search by popular post topics
AHRC
BRIAN
BU research
clinical research
CMMPH
CMWH
collaboration
collaborative research
conference
congratulations
Dr. Pramod Regmi
Edwin-blog-post
ESRC
EU
event
Events
funding
funding opportunities
Fusion
Fusion Investment Fund
Health
horizon 2020
HSC
impact
innovation
knowledge exchange
media
midwifery
Nepal
nhs
NIHR
open access
Prof. Edwin van Teijlingen
publication
public engagement
publishing
ref
research
Research Councils
research professional
RKE development framework
RKEDF
social sciences
training
widening participation
Research Information Network
- Physical Sciences Case studies: information use and discovery
- Information handling in collaborative research: an exploration of five case studies
- Information literacy monitoring and evaluation
- Data centres: their use, value and impact
- Heading for the open road: costs and benefits of transitions in scholarly communications
Thank you. This is really useful taking things like survey monkey to a whole new level. It has got me thinking about data collection methods if the FP7 bid is successful. There are also questions about representativeness of sample if data is gathered in this way. I am not sure how much of the population would be excluded. There must already be data on the penetration of smart phones and apps being used by whom?
@ Chris Talking about populations and samples is notoriously difficult when dealing with a fluid online population. Even when the population can be identified getting a workable response rate from an online survey is challenging.
Surveys are only one way of carrying out online research. I’ve just run two small projects, one using data from online discussion boards, and the other using email interviews (participants were drawn from an online community). The 2nd study was exploring some of the ethical issues in online research. The report is due out very soon, I’ll post details on the research blog when its ready.
This is a very interesting, and broad, area that is rapidly developing.
Interesting article about patient driven research. http://portal.lillycoi.com/2012/10/02/patient-driven-research-relies-on-open-web-info/