During my time as a journal editor, first at ‘Nurse Researcher‘ and for the past 12 years at the ‘Journal of Clinical Nursing‘, there is one challenge that has become increasingly difficult: finding peer reviewers. Like many editors, I often need to invite multiple potential reviewers before securing the two needed to assess a manuscript. This is a growing concern and one that reflects wider pressures on academic workloads.
Most academics recognise the importance of peer review, yet it often sits low on a long list of competing priorities. Reviewing is rarely formally recognised in workload models and is often undertaken outside working hours. As a result, invitations are frequently declined or unanswered. With delays in identifying peer reviewers, publication timelines lengthen and the dissemination of new knowledge can be delayed. In health research, this can have implications for the implementation of new and potentially life-changing interventions.
Engaging in peer review also offers important benefits for academics themselves. Reviewing manuscripts exposes scholars to emerging research before publication and can sharpen critical appraisal skills. It provides insight into how papers are constructed, how arguments are strengthened and how methodological weaknesses are addressed. Many academics find that peer reviewing improves their own writing and helps them better understand what journal editors and reviewers look for in submissions.
Peer review is therefore both a collective responsibility and a professional development opportunity. When we undertake peer review, we support the scholarly community that ultimately evaluates our own work. The sustainability of academic publishing depends on all of us contributing our expertise when we can. Engaging in peer review should also be supported by academic institutions, which also benefit from their employees undertaking peer review.
If you would like to know more about peer reviewing for the ‘Journal of Clinical Nursing’ please contact me at lgelling@bournemouth.ac.uk.
Peer review picking up weaknesses in a scientific paper
Peer-reviewing ten years on










New BU Physiology paper
Gender and street names
Help Shape the Future of Research at BU: Postgraduate Research Experience Survey 2026 Now Open
3C Event: Research Culture, Community & Cherry Blossom – Tuesday 14 April
REMINDER: 3MT® Competition – Deadline 9am Monday 20 April
New academic paper on Nepal
ECR Funding Open Call: Research Culture & Community Grant – Apply now
ECR Funding Open Call: Research Culture & Community Grant – Application Deadline Friday 12 December
MSCA Postdoctoral Fellowships 2025 Call
ERC Advanced Grant 2025 Webinar
Update on UKRO services
European research project exploring use of ‘virtual twins’ to better manage metabolic associated fatty liver disease