Open Access: not every new journal is rogue!
Open Access publishing is the hot topic in academic publishing. It comes from the idea that publicly funded research used to end up in expensive journals which are difficult to access and which are expensive to users. It also made for real ivory tower research and it did not give the general public, often the funder of research through taxation or charity access to the studies which they ‘paid’ for in the first instance. The success shows in (a) the rising Impact Factors of online Open Access journals, such as, for example BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth; (b) the requirement for the UK funding bodies that all research its funds needs to be published as Open Access by 2016; and (c) the growing number of traditional academic journals that now offer authors the option to pay for online Open Access in addition to the traditional paper-based journal publication, for example Midwifery. Two further signs of success are: (d) the growing popularity of Open Access Week, this month (20-26 Oct.) we celebrate for the 7th time Open Access Week ( http://www.openaccessweek.org/); and (e) the growing number of rogue journals trying to cash in on the Open Access trend.
The latter is the ugly face of capitalism whereby opportunists, i.e. unscrupulous publishers jump on the bandwagon cashing in on a successful service. BU librarian Jean Harris recently shared an interesting article about Predatory Publishers (see: www.cilip.org.uk/cilip/blog/are-we-doing-enough-warn-users-about-predatory-journals?utm_source=Communicator_membership_list&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=Untitled21&utm_campaign=Weekly+News+from+CILIP%2c+18+Sept+2014). Predatory publishers create a convincing looking scientific journal on the web, often borrowing details from other journals. They then email academics and researchers for both manuscripts and the offer to sit on the journal’s editorial board. Submissions are then “peer reviewed” and an invoice for Open Access publishing emailed by return. No submission is rejected! Many of us will have received such spam emails.
The message is not the fall for the scam. Prospective authors should check the webpages of the journal (although some fake ones can be convincing). Talk to more experienced colleagues in your field or your librarian to find out what they know about the ‘new’ journal, do they know someone on the editorial board. Is the journal listed in reputable electronic databases such as SCOPUS? Please, do not rely on information from Google on the journal you are trying to suss out!
Prof. Edwin van Teijlingen