I feel very fortunate to have reached a significant milestone in publishing; 50 peer reviewed articles. I thought I would stop and reflect as over the years I have learnt a great deal. I don’t remember my first publication…why? Well I was one of a number of authors and didn’t complete the final write up, or submission process. Don’t get me wrong, it was a fantastic time for celebration, but I wasn’t aware of ‘the struggle’. My second I remember clearly. A systematic review as part of my PhD. A horrendously verbose, difficult to read and overall, poorly written article. The science was robust but the writing – fit for insomnia. It was also my introduction to peer reviewers. This paper took 6 submissions before it was fit for publishing (was the science robust?) and really tested resilience and perseverance. How could they not value/understand, or even just ‘get’ the importance of my article! Now some years older and perhaps wiser I have come to understand that this lack of valuing/understanding of the work comes from how I have written it. This realisation has very much changed my ‘approach’ to reading peer reviewed comments. The often personal feelings that are rattled by the comments, I believe should be taken as a lack of clarity in the writing – how can this be made clearer for potential non-experts in the field. This is the essence of my second learning point. When I stated writing for publication, I believed the aim was to try and sound as clever/intellectual as possible (was this imposter syndrome coming through?). This resulted in, again, poorly written articles with complex concepts made more complex, moving them further from the reader’s understanding of the work. Therefore, I believe that the simpler the writing the better, for clarity and understanding by the readers. I try to think how I can explain complex concepts in the simplest way to make the work more accessible to many more readers. The experts will always ‘get’ it. My final thoughts are to celebrate the success of each and every publication and any publication milestones, be it numbers, citations or impact. With that in mind I’m off for a beer. Cheers.
BU staff can login below:
Don’t miss a post!
Subscribe for the BU Research Digest, delivered freshly every day.
Recent posts
BU research Funding opportunities EU
- Speaker @ NLP Healthcare Summit 2025: Evaluating LLMs in Understanding Image Series Textual Narratives2 April 2025
First paper by PhD student2 April 2025
Update: ESRC Festival Info Session Rescheduled to Wednesday 23 April 11am-12pm1 April 2025
Prof. Jonathan Parker on social welfare1 April 2025
- BU academic Anastasia Veneti invited to participate at the prestigious Delphi Economic Forum, 9-12 April 2025 discussing on Radicalism and Challenges on Democracy31 March 2025
Nepal Family Cohort Study dissemination event28 March 2025
- This week – Konfer – an innovation and collaboration platform17 March 2025
MSCA Postdoctoral Fellowships 202510 March 2025
Horizon Europe info days 20257 March 2025
- Last chance to apply for ECRN/RKEDF Funding. Closes 10th March27 February 2025
- Recruiting Participants for International Students Project26 February 2025
- BA/Leverhulme Small Research Grants June 2025 round20 February 2025
MSCA Postdoctoral Fellowships 202510 March 2025
Update on UKRO services13 February 2025
European research project exploring use of ‘virtual twins’ to better manage metabolic associated fatty liver disease4 February 2025
- Horizon Europe funding – Weds 12th Feb21 January 2025
- BU research to explore how artificial intelligence can help detect and investigate crime13 January 2025
BU Professor has been invited to a series of plenary and invited lectures.5 May 2024
Search by Category
Search by popular post topics
AHRC
BRIAN
BU research
clinical research
CMMPH
CMWH
collaboration
collaborative research
conference
congratulations
Doctoral College
Dr. Pramod Regmi
Edwin-blog-post
ESRC
EU
event
Events
funding
funding opportunities
Fusion
Health
horizon 2020
HSC
impact
innovation
knowledge exchange
media
midwifery
Nepal
nhs
NIHR
open access
Prof. Edwin van Teijlingen
publication
public engagement
publishing
ref
research
Research Councils
research professional
RKE development framework
RKEDF
social sciences
training
widening participation
Research Information Network
- Physical Sciences Case studies: information use and discovery
- Information handling in collaborative research: an exploration of five case studies
- Information literacy monitoring and evaluation
- Data centres: their use, value and impact
- Heading for the open road: costs and benefits of transitions in scholarly communications