BU Research Blog

Tagged / Paralympics

September 16, 2021

BU researchers launch Olympic and Paralympic analysis report

Global engagement, Impact, Knowledge Exchange, open access, Publishing, Research communication, Research news Daniel Jackson

We are delighted to announce the publication of Olympic and Paralympic Analysis 2020: Mega events, media, and the politics of sport

Edited by Daniel Jackson, Alina Bernstein, Michael Butterworth, Younghan Cho, Danielle Sarver Coombs, Michael Devlin and Chuka Onwumechili

Featuring 114 contributors from leading academics from around the world – including several from BU staff and PGR students – this publication captures the immediate thoughts, reflections, and insights from the 2020 Olympic and Paralympic Games from the cutting edge of sport, communication and media research.

Published in the wake of the Tokyo 2020 Games, these contributions are short and accessible. Authors provide authoritative analysis of the Olympics and Paralympics, including research findings and new theoretical insights. Contributions come from a rich array of disciplinary influences, including media, communication studies, cultural studies, sociology, political science, and psychology.

As always, these reports are free to access.

The report can be found onhttps://olympicanalysis.org

Direct pdf download is available at:

https://bit.ly/Olympic_Paralympic_Analysis-2020_large

https://bit.ly/Olympic_Paralympic_Analysis-2020_small

The table of contents is below.

Section 1: Tokyo & Mega-Events

1. The typhoon games (Toby Miller)
2. A green Olympic legacy for future generations? (Brett Hutchins and Ben Glasson)
3. The rise of critical consciousness in Japan: An intangible and unintended legacy of the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games (Koji Kobayashi)
4. Host city and mega-events: Olympic legacy in Japan (John Horne)
5. Lessons from Tokyo: the impact of the Paralympics in Japan (Dennis J. Frost)
6. Let’s play! Inspiring an inclusive mindset with a hands-on Paralympic experience for children and teenagers in Japan (Olga Kolotouchkina and Carmen Llorente-Barroso)
7. The Olympic & Paralympic sponsorship without category exclusivity: Background of sponsorship exclusivity in Olympic and Paralympic Games (OPG) (Shintaro Sato)
8. Power sharing: Olympic sponsorship and the athlete’s personal brand (Bettina Cornwell)
9. What happened to Rule 40 at Tokyo 2020? (John Grady)
10. The Olympic Games and ambush marketing via social media (Gashaw Abeza)
11. The soft power of the Olympics in the age of Covid 19 (J. Simon Rofe)
12. Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games, nationalism, identity and soft power (Gayle McPherson and Solomon Ilevbare)
13. Tokyo 2020, East Asian geopolitics and Olympic diplomacy (Jung Woo Lee)
14. Cultural programming at Tokyo 2020: the impossible Olympic festival city? (Beatriz Garcia)
15. Anti-sex beds? Fake news! : why this video went massively viral? (Maki Hirayama)
16. Counting cases, counting medals: Containing the Olympic contagion during the Tokyo Games (Courtney M. Cox)
17. Public relations as the key in the 2020 Tokyo Olympic and Paralympic Games (Argyro Elisavet Manoli and Sungkyung Kim)
18. The Tokyo 2020 Organizing Committee’s veil of effective public relations to help save itself and the start of the Games (Karen Hartman)
19. Environmental leadership showcased in the Olympic Games (Brian P. McCullough)
20. Simone Biles and prioritizing athlete well-being (Kathleen Bachynski)
21. Pride and burden of striving for perfection at the Olympics (Wycliffe Njonorai)
22. Deliver a medal or apologize: A daunting task imposed on Japanese Olympians (Hatsuko Itaya)

Section 2: Media Coverage & Representation

23. What place is this? Tokyo’s made-for-television Olympics (David Rowe)
24. How do we truly interpret the Tokyo Olympic ratings? (Andrew C. Billings)
25. ‘A Games like no other’: The demise of FTA live Olympic sport? (Raymond Boyle)
26. The fleeting nature of an Olympic meme: Virality and IOC TV rights (Merryn Sherwood)
27. Tokyo 2021: the TV Olympics (Peter English)
28. The Olympic Channel: insights on its distinctive role in Tokyo 2020 (Xavier Ramon)
29. Reshaping the Olympics media coverage through innovation (José Luis Rojas Torrijos)
30. Temporality of emotionalizing athletes (Sae Oshima)
31. New Olympic sports: the mediatization of action sports through the Olympic Games 2020 Tokyo (Thomas Horky)
32. Media wins medal for coverage of athletes as people, instead of entertainers (Ryan Broussard)
33. Reporting at a distance. Stricter working conditions and demands on sports journalists during the Olympics (Jana Wiske)
34. Nigeria: Olympic Games a mystery for rural dwellers in Lagos (Unwana Akpan)
35. Tokyo 2020: A look through the screen of Brazilian television (William Douglas de Almeida and Katia Rubio)
36. Equestrian sports in media through hundred Olympic years. A roundtrip from focus to shade and back again? (Susanna Hedenborg and Aage Radmann)
37. An Olympic utopia: separating politics and sport. Primary notes after analyzing the opening ceremony media coverage of mainstream Spanish sport newspapers (Xavier Ginesta)
38. “Everything seemed very complicated”: Journalist experiences of covering the Tokyo 2020 Paralympic Games (Veronika Mackova)
39. “A ceremony for television”: the Tokyo 2020 media ritual (Andressa Fontes Guimarães-Mataruna, Adriano Lopes de Souza, Renan Petersen-Wagner, Doiara Silva dos Santos, Leonardo José Mataruna-Dos-Santos and Otávio Guimarães Tavares da Silva)
40. The paradox of the parade of nations: A South Korean network’s coverage of the opening ceremony at the 2020 Tokyo Olympics (Ji-Hyun Ahn)
41. Simone Biles, journalistic authority, and the ideology of sports news (Michael Mirer)
42. Representing high performance: Brazilian sports journalists and mass communication professionals discuss their philosophies on producing progressive Paralympic coverage (Fernanda Silva and John Watson)
43. How digital content creators are shaping meanings about world class para-athletes (Carolyn Jackson-Brown)
44. Is the Paralympic Games a second-class event? (Tatiane Hilgemberg)
45. Representations of gender in media coverage of the Tokyo 2020 Paralympic Games (Toni Bruce)
46. Reshaping the superhuman to the super ordinary: Observations on the Tokyo 2021 Paralympic games through Australian broadcasting coverage (Simon Darcy and Tracey J. Dickson)
47. Super heroes among us: A brief discussion of using the superhero genre to promote Paralympic Games and athletes (Cody T. Havard)
48. ”Unity in Diversity” – The varying media representations of female Olympic athletes (Riikka Turtiainen)
49. Why we need to see the “ugly” in women’s sports (Erin Whiteside)
50. Twitter conversations on Indian female athletes in Tokyo (Kulveen Trehan)
51. Between sexualization and de-sexualization: the representation of female athletes in Tokyo 2020 (Jörg-Uwe Nieland)
52. Megan Rapinoe: The scary Bear for many Americans? (Molly Yanity)
53. Representations of gender in the live broadcast of the Tokyo Olympics (Toni Bruce)
54. “The gender-equal games” vs “The IOC is failing black women”: narratives of progress and failure of the 2020 Tokyo Olympics (Cheryl Cooky)
55. The male and female sports journalists divide on the Twittersphere during Tokyo 2020 (Haim Hagay and Alina Bernstein)

Section 3: Performance & Identity

56. ‘The Games they are a-changin’’: footnotes on Olympic athletics in transition post-Tokyo 2020 (Christopher D. Tulloch)
57. Tokyo 2020: athlete welfare and coping with new anxieties (Emma Kavanagh and Keith D. Parry)
58. Tokyo Olympics: When athletes are faced with the impossible (Dikaia Chatziefstathiou)
59. Twitter helps normalize discussions on mental health beyond athletes (Yuya Kiuchi)
60. Communication of athlete risk with head injuries in the 2020 Olympics (David Cassilio)
61. Racist slurs, stubborn animals, and colonial fear (Karsten Senkbeil)
62. Tokyo 2021 and the LGBTQ athlete (Rory Magrath)
63. The media coverage of the Tokyo 2021 Paralympic Games: Visibility, progress and politics (Emma Pullen, Laura Mora and Michael Silk)
64. It’s complicated: Disability media and the Paralympic Games (Katie Ellis)
65. Companies escape attention as debate on women’s uniform rages (Steve Bien-Aime, Melanie Formentin and Michelle Crowley)
66. Policing the uniforms and sportswear of Tokyo 2020: Commercialism in the name of competition (Linda Fuller)
67. Despite “Gender Equal Olympics,” focus still on what women are wearing (Adrianne Grubic)
68. Black women and Tokyo 2020 games: a continued legacy of racial insensitivity and exclusion (Manase Kudzai Chiweshe)
69. Naomi Osaka Bearing the Torch for a Mixed Race Japan (Jennifer McClearen)
70. Bodies of change: Women’s artistic gymnastics in Tokyo 2021 (Carly Stewart and Natalie Barker-Ruchti)
71. How the female athletes of the Tokyo Olympics are reframing the way we think about motherhood (Kim Bissell and Tyana Ellis)
72. When women aren’t women enough to compete (Anne Osborne)

Section 4: Fandom & National Identity

73. Home advantage in the Summer Olympic Games: evidence from Tokyo 2020 and prospects for Paris 2024 (Girish Ramchandani)
74. Fans as MVP, or the need for sensuous audiences in sport (Meredith Bagley)
75. Silence in the stands: Does it matter for fans? (Dorothy Collins)
76. Red, white, and rivalry: A brief discussion of United States rivalry at the Tokyo Olympic Games (Cody Havard)
77. Empty stadiums and the other sites of Olympic fandom (Lou Antolihao)
78. Sports betting and the branded purity of the Olympics (Jason Lopez)
79. National and ethnic Chinese identities on the Indonesian badminton court (Friederike Trotier)
80. How much is too much home-nation focus in Olympic coverage? (Andrew Billings)
81. The Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games: British imperial identity affirmed (Edward Loveman)
82. Communicating corporate social responsibility at the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games (Jake Kucek)
83. Americans on ideological left more engaged in Summer Olympics (Darin W. White)
84. South Korea’s changing status and perspective on Japan (Seok Lee)
85. The Men’s 1500 metres: Not quite erasing the ghosts of history (Garry Whannel)
86. Ghana: Poor local organizing, and absence of football team dampens interest (Ernest Acheampong and Ralph Frimpong)
87. Historical disputes, national identity, and the South Korea-Japan summit that did not happen (Guy Podoler)
88. Pop culture diplomacy: Japan’s use of videogames, anime to promote the Olympics and appeal to younger audiences (Adolfo Gracia Vázquez)
89. At the intersection of COVID-19 and Tokyo Olympics 2020: Vlogs and the expression of Chinese nationalist sentiments (Tianwei Ren)
90. Fandom and digital media during the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games: A Brazilian perspective using @TimeBrasil Twitter data (Renan Petersen-Wagner, Andressa Fontes Guimarães-Mataruna, Adriano Lopes de Souza, Doiara Silva dos Santos, Leonardo José Mataruna-Dos-Santos and Otávio Guimarães Tavares da Silva)
91. National hierarchy in Israeli Olympic discourses (Ilan Tamir)

Section 5: Politics of Sport

92. At Tokyo Games, athlete activism takes front row seat despite IOC’s attempts to silence athletes (Yannick Kluch, Nina Siegfried, Mary A. Hums and Eli A. Wolff)
93. Transgender participation at the Tokyo Olympics: Laurel Hubbard and a media tempest (Holly Thorpe, Shannon Scovel and Monica Nelson)
94. The sacred space of the Olympics (Anthony Cavaiani)
95. Media frames and the ‘humanity’ of athletes (Adam Rugg)
96. We want reform (Shaun M. Anderson)
97. In search of voice: behind the remarkable lack of protest at the Tokyo Paralympics (Filippo Trevisan)
98. The revolt of the Black athlete continues (Letisha Engracia Cardoso Brown)
99. WeThe15 shines a spotlight on disability activism (Damian Haslett and Brett Smith)
100. Will #WeThe85 finally include #WeThe15 as a legacy of Tokyo 2020? (Simon Darcy and Tracey J. Dickson)
101. Activism starts with representation: IPC Section 2.2 and the Paralympics as a platform for social justice (Nina Siegfried, Dr. Yannick Kluch, Mary A. Hums and Eli A. Wolff)
102. The colonization of the athletic body (Billy Hawkins)
103. Forced hijab and female athletes in postrevolutionary Iran (Shahrzad Enderle)
104. Pay equity & the Tokyo 2020 Olympics (Ellen Staurowsky)
105. Equal remuneration for a Paralympian (Mark Brooke)
106. Rooting for U.S. Olympians: Patriotism or polarization? (Amy Bass)
107. Anti-Olympics activism (Jules Boykoff)
108. The new kids on the block: Action sports at the Tokyo Olympic Games (Holly Thorpe and Belinda Wheaton)
109. Is there space on the podium for us all? (Jan Burns)
110. Softball’s field of Olympic dreams (Pamela Creedon)
111. Now you see them, now you don’t: Absent nations at Tokyo Paralympic Games (Nancy Quinn and Laura Misener)
112. The Tokyo Paralympics as a platform for change? Falling well short of sport and media ‘opportunities for all’ (Gerard Goggin and Brett Hutchins)
113. Tokyo 2020 Paralympics: inspirations and legacies (David McGillivray)
114. What social media outrage about Sha’Carri Richardson’s suspension could mean for the future of anti-doping policies (Natalie Brown-Devlin, Gary Wilcox, and Kristen Leah Sussman)

February 6, 2018

Prestigious Prize to be awarded to BU Paralympic Project

BU research, conferences epullen

Bournemouth University Faculty of Management colleagues Dr Emma Pullen and Professor Michael Silk, and Faculty of Media and Communication colleagues, Dr Dan Jackson and Dr Richard Scullion will be making headlines at the International Communication Association (ICA) annual conference (Sports Communication Division) in May 2018. They are being awarded the prestigious ICA best paper prize.

The paper is based on early findings from the Arts and Humanities Research Council funded project (grant ref: AH/P003842/1) on the cultural legacy of the 2016 Rio Paralympics. It is the first study of its kind to explore the mediation of para-sport broadcasting by highlighting the production decisions taken by the UK’s official Paralympic Broadcaster and the impact on audience perceptions and attitudes toward disability. Alongside academic outputs, the findings will be also translated into a number of creative artworks and a documentary film available to the public toward the end of the project.

Keep up to date with our progress via our project website www.pasccal.com, twitter:@pasccalproject, and the BU research blog.

May 30, 2017

Remembering Rio and the Paralympics

BU research cmartins

We’re keen to hear about your memories and experiences of watching the Paralympic Games last summer. If you would like your voice to be heard as part of a 2-year project researching the impact and legacy of the Paralympics, then get in touch and join one of our small friendly focus group discussions taking place during the weeks of June 12th and June 19th 2017.

We kindly ask you to ‘sign up’ to join one of the following groups:

GROUP 1: Non-disabled with no direct experience of disability
GROUP 2: Including both non-disabled and those with direct personal experience of disability
GROUP 3: Those with direct personal experience of disability

The dates and timings of each focus group are provided below.

GROUP 1 Monday June 12th & 19th – 5.30pm (refreshments) 6pm start. Ends no later than 7.30pm
GROUP 2 Wednesday June 14th & 21st – 2pm (refreshments) 2.30pm start. Ends no later than 4pm.
GROUP 3 Thursday June 15th & 22nd – 5.30pm (refreshments) 6pm start. Ends no later than 7.30pm.

Car parking and refreshments will be provided.

To thank you for your time and effort each participant will receive an M&S voucher to the value of £15.00

For more information and to register your interest please call us now on 01202 965046 or email cmartins@bournemouth.ac.uk

REGISTER ON EVENTBRITE.

When registering, please let us know of any accessibility requirements.

We look forward to some lively discussion!

June 23, 2016

Hello from Osman Ahmed: Lecturer in Physiotherapy in the Faculty of Health and Social Sciences

Uncategorized ahmedo

Hi all,

I’ve been a bit slow in uploading an introduction the BU research blog but wanted to say thanks to everyone for making feel at home at BU. I’ve been in the role of physiotherapy lecturer in the Faculty of Health and Social Sciences for about 2 months now and am enjoying it greatly so far.

My clinical background is as a physiotherapist, and I have worked both locally (at Poole Hospital and the Royal Bournemouth Hospital) and internationally (in New Zealand). As well as working at BU, I am also currently working at Poole Hospital NHS Trust as an outpatient physiotherapist, and with the Football Association with their disability football squads. My work in this field is due to take me to Rio De Janeiro in September for the 2016 Paralympic Games.

My main areas of research interest are eHealth/mHealth, sports concussion, and disability sport. I was lucky enough to do my PhD at the University of Otago in New Zealand, where my thesis centred upon the use of Facebook to assist the return to play following sports-concussion. I am looking forwards to helping to educate the next generation of physiotherapists to be forward-thinking and able to cope with the demands of an ever-changing world.

Being Dorset born and bred, I am very proud to be working at BU at this exciting time for the university. I hope that BU can mirror the development of AFC Bournemouth (where I have a season ticket) with regards to reaching new heights and levels of success!

Best wishes,

Osman

September 18, 2012

Cafe Scientifique Talk Update- The Fastest Men On No Legs: Oscar Pistorius, prosthetic limbs & the role of technology in elite sport

Public engagement Naomi Kay

For years debate has circulated around Oscar Pistorius and allowing him to compete in able bodied events at the Olympics when he may or may not have an unfair advantage. Most recently he sparked further debate himself in the criticisms of the length of Alan Oliveira’s blades directly after his defeat in the 200m Paralympic final. So what’s the difference? Does running on prosthetics give you an advantage over the able bodied, or simply level the playing field? Can longer blades give you the advantage over the other competitors?

Cafe Scientifique’s second event, coming up on Tuesday 6th Novemeber, Bryce Dyer, a senior lecturer in Product Design at Bournemouth University, will attempt to answer some of these questions.

Bryce will discuss and explore the recent controversy surrounding the use of prosthetic limbs in elite sport, what we know, what we don’t and how what was once initially seen as disability is now redefining sport as we know it, before allowing you time to ask him any questions you may have.

August 27, 2012

Seen but Seldom Heard with John Hegley

Public engagement Naomi Kay

You may have seen earlier this month a post about the work being done by BU academics from the Media School and the School of Health and Social Care, working with performance poets to help disabled young people from the Victoria Education Centre have a voice through poetry. This Thursday marks the first showcase of the Paralympic inspired work these students have produced.

Running from 7:30pm – 11:00pm at the ICCI 360 arena in Weymouth, this event includes spoken word, film and performance by young Dorset voices supported by poets John Hegley, Jonny Fluffypunk and Liv Torc in a 360 degree audio-visual spectacle that promises to take poetry to the next level! This is an excellent example of public engagement and looks to be an exciting event so if you’re free come along this Thursday (30th August), tickets are £5, available from the Weymouth Pavilion Box Office.

November 30, 2011

Find out how BU research is helping councils improve the delivery of the Olympics and Paralympics

BU research Julie Northam

Watch this excellent short video from BU’s Dr Richard Shipway who discusses the 2012 Olympic and Paralympic games and how his research has been used by local councils to improve the delivery of the games in the area.

To see other BU videos on YouTube go to the BU YouTube page!

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uy_B4Nbzvv4

Tagged / Paralympics

BU researchers launch Olympic and Paralympic analysis report

Remembering Rio and the Paralympics

REGISTER ON EVENTBRITE.

Hello from Osman Ahmed: Lecturer in Physiotherapy in the Faculty of Health and Social Sciences

Cafe Scientifique Talk Update- The Fastest Men On No Legs: Oscar Pistorius, prosthetic limbs & the role of technology in elite sport

Find out how BU research is helping councils improve the delivery of the Olympics and Paralympics

Other services

Don’t miss a post!

Recent posts

Search by Category

Research Information Network

UKRI

Tagged / Paralympics

REGISTER ON EVENTBRITE.

Other services

Don’t miss a post!

Recent posts

Search by Category

Search by popular post topics