If you want to know more about REF2021, the Research Excellence Framework website includes a number of frequently asked questions (FAQs), which might be useful if you have any queries about your own submission.
In the meantime, here is a selection of some relating to Outputs.
Can outputs published while at a non-UK institution, or as an independent scholar, be submitted to REF 2021?
Yes, where they are within the publication period and meet any other applicable eligibility criteria, these outputs may be included in submissions by the institution employing the staff member on the census date.
Will part-time staff have to meet the requirement for a minimum of one output?
Yes. The minimum and maximum limits on the number of outputs will apply to the person, not their FTE.
What will happen if a unit does not submit the required number of outputs or case studies?
Each missing output or case study will receive an ‘unclassified’ score.
Does the REF assessment process distinguish between research outputs on the basis of mode of publication, place of publication or publisher?
No. The REF is governed by a principle of equity and is committed to the fair and equal assessment of all types of research and forms of research output.
Will approaches to double-weighting monographs be determined at main panel level?
Yes. As was the case in REF 2014, each main panel will provide guidance on how outputs of extended scale and scope are characterised in their disciplines, and on the process for requesting an output to be double-weighted.
Does each output for which double-weighting is requested need to have its own individual reserve output? Or can one submit a list of ‘reserve outputs’ (in order of preference) to cover several double-weighting requests?
A ranked list would add greater complexity to the submission process for institutions, in ensuring that the minimum and maximum boundaries are adhered to in the final set of assessed outputs. Institutions should therefore include a ‘reserve’ output for each output requested for double-weighting.
Will double-weighting outputs be optional?
Yes. The decision whether to request double-weighting lies with the submitting unit.
Will a double-weighted item from a single individual count as two items of their five or one?
Where the double-weighting request is accepted, the output will count as two items against the individual to whom it is attributed. (If it is a co-authored output, institutions may attribute the output to a maximum of two members of staff returned within the same submission, in which case it will count as one output for each of them). If the panel does not accept the request, and the output remains single-weighted, it will count as one item.
In the event the request is accepted, or in the event that it is not and the reserve output is assessed instead, the requirement for a minimum of one output should still be met for each Category A submitted staff member (unless individual circumstances apply), and no more than five outputs should be attributed to any one member of current or former staff.
Where an institution employs a member of staff on the census date, which of their outputs can be submitted?
For Category A submitted staff, outputs that are within the publication period and meet any other applicable eligibility criteria (for example, open access requirements) are eligible.
Can the outputs from one staff member be submitted to different units within the same institution?
No. An individual and their outputs can only be submitted to one unit of assessment. Where an individual holds a joint appointment across two or more submitting units within the same institution, the institution must decide on one submission in which to return the individual.
Want to know more?
Also, have a look at our other BU REF Week blog posts.