BU Research Blog

April 28, 2021

Event: Journalism – an effective bridge between research and policy?

Social Science and the media: How can journalism provide an effective bridge between research and policy?
A free online event on 24 May to explore how we can grow a more supportive relationship between journalism, social research and policy. The meeting is part of a series organised by Transforming Evidence, an interdisciplinary collaboration aiming to share learning, connect communities and generate meaningful research about how we make and use evidence. This workshop aims to bring together academics, researchers, journalists and funders to discuss the current and potential role of the media in influencing the relationship between university research and policy

AGENDA

13:00 Welcome and introduction to Transforming Evidence

Professor Annette Boaz, co-lead Transforming Evidence.

13:05 Introductions

Jonathan Breckon(Chair)

13:10 What more can social scientists do to provide relevant and high-quality news content?

David Walker, contributing editor Guardian Public, and ex-ESRC Board Member

13:20 The role of academic expertise in media debates on Europe in post-Brexit Britain

Professor Catherine Barnard FBA, Deputy Director, UK in Changing Europe.

13:30 Educational research for the media; how best to inform policymaking for schools?

Fran Abrams, Chief Executive, Education Media Centre.

13:40 Academic rigour and journalistic flair: what role can intermediary organisations play
between journalist, academics and policy makers?

David Levy, Trustee, The Conversation UK and Senior Research Associate,
Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford

13:50 Chair leads discussion with speakers & audience Q&A

14:15 Finish

March 8, 2021

BU project explores potential power of constructive journalism in Covid-19 aftermath

BU research Julie Northam

Throughout the Covid-19 pandemic, the news media have played an instrumental role in providing the latest updates and information. An increasing number of people, however, have sometimes avoided the news, finding negative coverage has a detrimental effect on their mood and wellbeing.

A new collaborative project will explore how constructive journalism – also known as solutions journalism – can increase audience engagement and empower communities to tackle the problems they face in the aftermath of the pandemic.

Constructive journalism breaks from traditional journalism’s focus on reporting social problems to also feature how people respond to problems, in order to help audiences to feel more motivated, inspired and empowered to deal with challenges.

Early evidence shows that this style of journalism also leads to greater engagement, with articles read more deeply and shared more widely.

The project is being undertaken by Bournemouth University (BU) in conjunction with Newsquest, one of the UK’s largest publishers of local and regional newspapers, with training and consultancy provided by the US-based Solutions Journalism Network, and the Association of British Science Writers.

Dr An Nguyen, Associate Professor of Journalism at BU, is leading the project, which is funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council as part of the UK Research and Innovation’s Covid-19 rapid-response research scheme.

He said: “Traditionally, due to their professional dedication to the watchdog role in monitoring and holding powers to account, journalists focus disproportionately on social problems and pay inadequate attention to the ways to solve problems.

“Over time, it has become a bit too much of ‘doom and gloom’ news, which can lead to many people becoming mentally fatigued, desensitised or feeling helpless or powerless, because they can’t see a way out or don’t know how they could take action.

“Constructive journalism does not shy away from the crucial watchdog function but aims to offer a balance, moving away from focusing on problems to also exploring how problems are tackled and solved.”

Dr Nguyen added that the pandemic offered an opportunity to deploy constructive journalism in a large scale to help the UK’s local and regional communities and investigate the potential of constructive journalism in helping the public to deal with the social issues of our time.

“People will face a lot of problems during the transition out of lockdown and will try to find ways to limit the damages and adapt to the ‘new normal’,” he said.

“There is an increasing recognition among news industry that constructive journalism can be valuable. This project is an opportunity to test this concept in the context of one of the biggest issues the world is facing and see whether journalism can help people.”

Journalists across the UK, including journalism students, will receive training to produce constructive journalism through series of online training webinars. About 50 of them will then be mentored on a one-to-one basis by journalists with experience in constructive journalism to produce solutions-focused news for Newsquest’s local and regional titles.

It is hoped that at least 1,000 pieces of constructive journalism will be produced in relation to Covid-19 recovery during this campaign. A new professional network of UK constructive journalists will also be established and launched at the end of the project.

A research team in BU’s Department of Communication and Journalism will conduct in-depth interviews, surveys and experiments with local news audiences, including community leaders, to investigate how solutions-focused news can affect the mental health and wellbeing of the public, as well as civic engagement.

“We are trying to explore what type of constructive journalism would work, what sort of effects it has on audiences and how it might or might not help them to be more optimistic, motivated, inspired or empowered to take actions,” said Dr Nguyen.

The team will also conduct a detailed analysis of the solutions-focused news output from the campaign as well as interview the mentored journalists and their editors about their experience.

Dr Nguyen said: “We’ll look at the content output and see what sort of reporting techniques are used, what are effective and how they engage people throughout the post-lockdown stage of the pandemic.

“We will feed our research findings back to the participating news outlets so that they are informed of the effect of their campaign and, where necessary, what might be done to improve things.”

February 4, 2021

BU research tackles global challenges – Aftershock Nepal

BU research, Global engagement Julie Northam

Funding from the Global Challenges Research Fund has enabled Bournemouth University academics to undertake cutting-edge research in partnership with organisations in developing countries. These projects help to build collaborations with researchers, policy-makers and practitioners in developing countries, ensuring that the outcomes of the research have tangible outcomes for people in those countries. In February, we are sharing stories about BU’s GCRF research.

In Nepal, one of the most disaster-prone nations in the world, Professor Einar Thorsen and Dr Chindu Sreedharan are undertaking research to understand the challenges that journalists face in reporting on disasters and to strengthen editorial preparedness by building capacity among journalists and journalism educators. The original Aftershock Nepal project brought together a team of 38 journalism students and seven staff members from five universities around the world. They travelled to the Himalayan country in the run-up to the first anniversary of the 2015 Nepalese earthquake, capturing stories which explored loss, recovery and life after the catastrophe, in a bid to help the Nepalese people. The project produced a single-issue news site, with an alternative, people-centred coverage on post-disaster Nepal.

GCRF funding enabled the publication of the project’s first report in September 2018 entitled Voices from Nepal: challenges faced and lessons learnt in post-disaster journalism. This was followed a year later with the publication of a bilingual book with UNESCO in Kathmandu and two years later with the publication of a bilingual report in Nepali and English that mapped the impact of COVID-19 on journalists in Nepal.

Summer 2020, in cooperation with the Kamana Group, one of Nepal’s leading media houses, saw development of the nation’s first disaster journalism editorial policy, Reporting Disasters: Code of Conduct and Reporting Guidelines. Further, to address the gendered challenges in Nepali journalism, the project worked with the Working Women Journalists (WWJ) to deliver four training workshops. A peer-support network for female journalists was also established.

GCRF funding was instrumental in establishing the Disaster Journalism Network, a collaborative of six news organisations, in July 2020. Based on the information available, this is the world’s first disaster journalism network run solely by women journalists.

The benefits and impacts to Nepal include:

Policy changes and practices of news organisations, UNESCO, and the Nepal government. The Kamana Group adopted a disaster-specific editorial policy to guide its news coverage. Similarly, the project recommendations made a “valuable contribution” to policy research in Nepal’s Ministry of Women, Children and Senior Citizen, influencing its “thinking on gender mainstreaming and women empowerment in the media industry”.
Policy changes and working practices of three national journalism organisations. The project brought about changes within the Federation of Nepali Journalists and Working Women Journalists, which adopted resolutions to committing action on disaster resilience.
Capacity-building for 105 journalists and changes in curricula and pedagogical approaches. This was achieved via workshops delivered in partnership with the Nepal Press Institute, Disaster Journalism Network, Tribhuvan University and the Kantipur City College.

Read more about Aftershock Nepal on the project website: https://www.bournemouth.ac.uk/research/projects/aftershock-nepal-changing-perceptions-through-sustained-crisis-journalism.

February 2, 2021

BU research tackles global challenges – Media Action Against Rape (India)

BU research, Global engagement Julie Northam

Funding from the Global Challenges Research Fund has enabled Bournemouth University academics to undertake cutting-edge research in partnership with organisations in developing countries. These projects help to build collaborations with researchers, policy-makers and practitioners in developing countries, ensuring that the outcomes of the research have tangible outcomes for people in those countries. Over the next couple of weeks, we will be sharing stories about BU’s GCRF research.

In India, Professor Einar Thorsen and Dr Chindu Sreedharan are leading the Media Action Against Rape (MAAR) project in partnership with UNESCO New Delhi. The project is looking at the way in which sexual violence is reported in the media. It is the largest study to date analysing news reporting of rape in India – based on 258 in-depth interviews with journalists from 15 languages working across broadcast, print and online media; and a newspaper content analysis across 6 languages. The project maps the challenges journalists face and the way they operationalise existing codes of practices to produce a set of country-specific journalism guidelines. MAAR is building capacity to engender sustainable impact —specifically, for rape reportage, journalism education, and resilience against gendered violence towards women. By working with journalists and reviewing existing journalistic guidelines, the team aims to better understand the complexities of reporting in this area and inform the ways in which reporting should change.

15 events were hosted as part of MAAR, taking place in New Delhi, Bangalore, Chennai, Mumbai, Pune and Kottayam. These included panel discussions, film screenings, workshops, and street and forum theatre performances (http://www.maar.in/events/). Across the venues, MAAR reached an audience of more than 1,100 people, including journalists, UN representatives, NGO workers, educators, and students.

The MAAR project established the NewsTracker website established, which focusses on the representation of rape and sexual violence in the Indian news media. 177 original stories have been published to date on the website. Two books were published in 2020 (Notes for the Media: Ordinary Indians on the Reporting of Sexual Violence, November 2020; and Hold your Story: Reflections on the News of Sexual Violence in India, November 2020).

MAAR publishes a weekly e-mail newsletter (NoteThis) with curated news about rape and sexual violence from across India (50 editions so far). There is also a searchable database designed for journalists and NGO workers to give access to the raw data behind the NoteThis newsletter.

The MAAR project report and guidelines are due to be launched in New Delhi later this month.

Find out more about the project on the MAAR website: http://www.maar.in/.

June 19, 2017

BU academics publish UK election report within 10 days of vote

BU research Daniel Jackson

We are very pleased to announce the publication of UK Election Analysis 2017: Media, Voters and the Campaign, edited by Einar Thorsen, Daniel Jackson and Darren Lilleker.

Featuring 92 contributions from over 100 leading academics and emerging scholars across the world, this free publication captures the immediate thoughts, reflections and early research insights on the 2017 UK General Election on from the cutting edge of media and politics research.

Published just 10 days after the election, these contributions are short and accessible. Authors provide authoritative analysis of the campaign, including research findings or new theoretical insights; to bring readers original ways of understanding the election and its consequences. Contributions also bring a rich range of disciplinary influences, from political science to cultural studies, journalism studies to geography.

The publication is available as a free downloadable PDF, as a website and as a paperback report.

Website URL: http://www.electionanalysis.uk

Direct PDF download: http://bit.ly/UKElectionAnalysis2017_Thor sen-Jackson-and-Lilleker_v 1

Thanks to all of our contributors and production staff who helped make the quick turnaround possible. We hope it makes for a vibrant and engaging read!

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction (Einar Thorsen, Dan Jackson, Darren Lilleker)

Context

1. Looking on the bright side for a change (Jay Blumler)

2. The performance of the electoral system (Alan Renwick)

3. Fixed-term parliaments and the electoral cycle (Richard Parry)

4. Institutions and nation building: there is such a thing as society (Matthew Johnson)

5. Global questions, parochial answers (Roman Gerodimos)

6. The future of illusions (Barry Richards)

Voters, Polls and Results

7. A glorious defeat: anti-politics and the funnelling of frustration (Matthew Flinders)

8. Younger voters politically energised, but the generational divide deepens (James Sloam)

9. Why the younger generation of Corbynistas? (Pippa Norris)

10. Young people and propaganda in the wake of the 2017 election (Shakuntala Banaji)

11. The generation election: youth electoral mobilisation at the 2017 General Election (Matt Henn and James Hart)

12. The 2017 General Election: How Votes were split between “open and closed” (Jonathan Wheatley)

13. Cartographic perspectives of the general election (Benjamin D. Hennig)

14. UKIP’s former supporters were crucial to the outcome – but not as generally expected (Ron Johnston and Charles Pattie)

15. Why did the Lib Dems fail to benefit from the anti-Brexit vote? (Panos Koliastasis)

16. Meeting the public: the perils and pitfalls of ‘walkabout’ questions to Theresa May in GE2017 (Sylvia Shaw)

17. Political participation in the UK: why might voters have voted? (Bruce Bimber, Shelley Boulianne, Karolina Koc-Michalska and Darren Lilleker)

18. Moments of accidental connection with the ‘Great British Public’: because Brenda et al know best! (Richard Scullion)

19. When democracy kicked back (Natalie Fenton)

News and Journalism

20. Conventional wisdom distorted TV news coverage of campaign (Stephen Cushion)

21. A tale of two leaders: news media coverage of the 2017 General Election (David Deacon, John Downey, David Smith, James Stanyer and Dominic Wring)

22. Did broadcast stage-management create a vacuum for social media? (Charlie Beckett)

23. Ducking the debate (Stephen Coleman)

24. Caught in the middle: the BBC’s impossible impartiality dilemma (Martin Moore and Gordon Ramsay)

25. Media policy: the curious incident of the dog in the night-time (Jonathan Hardy)

26. The use and abuse of the vox pop in the 2017 UK General Election television news coverage (Mark Wheeler)

27. Media bias hits a wall (Des Freedman)

28. Declining newspaper sales and the role of broadcast journalism in the 2017 general election (Guy Starkey)

29. Newspapers’ editorial opinions: stuck between a rock and a hard place (Julie Firmstone)

30. It’s the Sun wot lost it (Mick Temple)

31. From Brexit to Corbyn: agenda setting, framing and the UK media – a research agenda (Steve Schifferes)

32. Is our national press a fading dinosaur? Don’t bank on it (Steven Barnett)

33. A mixed mailbag: letters to the editor during the electoral campaign (Iñaki Garcia-Blanco)

34. Long live the wisdom of the phone-in crowd (Ivor Gaber)

35. Fact-checking the election (Jennifer Birks)

36. Should we worry about fake news? (Susan Banducci, Dan Stevens and Travis Coan)

37. Tweets, campaign speeches and dogs at polling stations: the election on live blogs (Marina Dekavalla)

38. Process, personalities and polls: online news coverage of the UK General Election 2017 (Emily Harmer and Rosalynd Southern)

39. Online election news can be bloody difficult (for a) woman (Emily Harmer)

40. Not just swearing and loathing on the internet: analysing BuzzFeed and VICE during #GE2017 (James Dennis and Susana Sampaio-Dias)

Parties and the Campaign

41. The battle for authenticity (Karin Wahl-Jorgensen)

42. Was it the Labour doorstep or the Labour smartphone that swung it for Jeremy? (Tim Bale)

43. The election at constituency level (Ralph Negrine)

44. Over-managing the media: how it all went wrong (Suzanne Franks)

45. Aristotle and persuasive copywriting in the 2017 General Election (Nigel Jackson)

46. Rhetoric of the 2017 General Election campaign (Andrew Crines)

47. When is an electoral ‘bribe’ not a bribe? (Chris Roberts)

48. PEBs in 2017: not gone, but largely forgotten? (Vincent Campbell)

49. ‘Strong and stable’ to ‘weak and wobbly’: Tory campaign, media reaction and GE2017 (Anthony Ridge-Newman)

50. The Greens and the “progressive alliance” (Jenny Alexander)

51. It’s the way I tell ‘em: car crash politics and the gendered turn (Karen Ross)

52. Dogwhistle sexism (Heather Savigny)

53. The Women’s Equality Party and the 2017 General Election (Elizabeth Evans and Meryl Kenny)

54. The resurrection of ethical foreign policy (Victoria Honeyman)

55. Why immigration faded from view in election 2017 (Thomas Brooks)

56. Invisible enemies, wars without winners: when ‘khaki elections’ fail (James Morrison)

57. The sobering reality of backdoors: cybersecurity and surveillance circumvention during GE2017 (Einar Thorsen)

The Digital Campaign

58. Corbyn, Labour, digital media, and the 2017 UK election (Andrew Chadwick)

59. Was it ‘AI wot won it’? Hyper-targeting and profiling emotions online (Vian Bakir and Andrew McStay)

60. Sharing is caring: Labour supporters use of social media #GE2017 (Anamaria Dutceac and Michael Bossetta)

61. Labour’s social media campaign: more posts, more video, and more interaction (Richard Fletcher)

62. Like me, share me: the people’s social media campaign (Darren Lilleker)

63. The alternate and influential world of the political parties’ Facebook feeds (Matt Walsh)

64. Social media and the Corbyn breakthrough (Mark Shephard)

65. The UK digisphere and the 2017 election (Aljosha Karim Schapals)

66. From voices to votes: how young people used social media to influence the General Election (Vyacheslav Polonski)

67. All LOLs and trolls (Alec Charles)

The Nations

68. Nasty, British and Short: an emotional election (Russell Foster)

69. Scotland in the 2017 UK General Election (Michael Higgins)

70. The General Election did little to solve Wales’ ‘democratic deficit’ (Morgan Jones)

71. GE2017 in Northern Ireland: total eclipse of the moderates (Neil Matthews)

72. Twitter, dual screening and the BBC Northern Ireland Leaders’ debate (Paul Reilly)

Brexit and European Perspectives

73. Brexit without Brexitland (Chris Gifford)

74. Why the General Election will make little difference to the Article 50 negotiations (Simon Usherwood)

75. Totem, taboo and trigger word: the dominance and obscurity of Brexit in the campaigns (Charlotte O’Brien)

76. The Conservatives and Brexit: the election and after (Philip Lynch)

77. The 2017 UK election: reflections from Norway (John Erik Fossum)

78. Partisan and plentiful: the 2017 UK election in the German press (Isabelle Hertner)

79. Expect the unexpected: French media perceptions of the 2017 UK General Election campaign (Emmanuelle Avril)

80. Poles apart: Polish perspectives of the 2017 UK ‘Brexit election’ (Paweł Surowiec)

81. Theresa and Jeremy: who is closer to Matteo? An Italian view of #GE2017 (Emiliana De Blasio and Michele Sorice)

Personality politics and popular culture

82. A tale of two leadership campaigns (Pete Dorey)

83. Seeing Jeremy Corbyn and not seeing Theresa May: the promise of civic spectatorship (Katy Parry)

84. Corbyn and his fans: post-truth, myth and Labour’s hollow defeat (Cornell Sandvoss)

85. It’s the stans wot (nearly) won it (Matt Hills)

86. Celebrities4Corbyn: continuity and change in Labour’s use of celebrities (Ellen Watts)

87. The othering and objectification of Diane Abbott MP (Deborah Gabriel)

88. “Theresa May for Britain”: a personal brand in search of personality (Margaret Scammell)

89. Maybot, Mummy or Iron Lady? Loving and loathing Theresa May (Shelley Thompson and Candida Yates)

90. Politics, charisma, and the celebrity spectre of Nigel Farage (Neil Ewen)

91. Mainstream broadcast comedy and satire (Kay Richardson)

92. Sound bites: the music of Election 2017 (John Street and Adam Behr)

March 29, 2017

New report on the state of local news in the UK

BU research, Impact, Knowledge Exchange, policy, Public engagement, Publishing, Research communication, Research news Daniel Jackson

Last night at a packed house at Westminster we launched a new report: Mapping changes in local news 2015-2017 More bad news for democracy?

By Gordon Neil Ramsay, Des Freedman, Daniel Jackson and Einar Thorsen.

Speakers included Aasma Day, the investigative reporter and lifestyle editor at the Lancashire Post, professor Robert McChesney, Justin Schlosberg from the Media Reform Coalition and NUJ president Tim Dawson.

PDF of the report available from:http://bit.ly/LocalNewsMatters-Report_v1

Published by the Centre for the Study of Journalism, Culture and Community (at Bournemouth University) in collaboration with the National Union of Journalists, the Political Studies Association and the Centre for the Study of Media, Communication and Power (at King’s College London) this report maps recent changes in the state of local news provision in the UK including newspapers, broadcast and digital.

We document how:

▶ The majority of the UK (57.9%) is not served by a local daily newspaper.

▶ 45% of local authority districts are served by a single publisher.

▶ Local daily papers are overwhelmingly located in major urban areas.

▶ 77.1% of local newspaper titles are owned by the big five local newspaper publishers.

▶ Another 418 local journalism jobs have been lost in the last 17 months.

And argue for a range of interventions that could help alleviate the democratic crisis that is emerging through a lack of local journalism in the UK.

This report will interest academics, journalists, activists and policymakers concerned with the state of local news in the the UK.

More details of the local news mapping project and 2015 report at: http://localnewsmapping.uk

To learn more about the NUJ Local News Matters campaign and to find out how to get involved, please visit: https://www.nuj.org.uk/campaigns/local-news-matters-week/

And tomorrow in parliament, MPs will debate the state of the UK’s local media and an early day motion has been tabled calling for sustainable investment in professional local and regional news provision online, in newspapers and on radio and television.

May 14, 2016

BU Trauma and Journalism panel at The Freud Museum, Friday, 27 May, 6.30-8pm, Tickets still available!

BRIAN, BU research cyates

‘Trauma and Journalism’

A Panel Discussion on the Role of Trauma

in the Life and Work of Journalists

Venue: The Freud Museum, Maresfield Gardens, London, NW3 5SX

Friday 27 May, 6.30-8pm

Followed by drinks reception, 8-9pm

Tickets:

https://www.freud.org.uk/events/76447/trauma-and-journalism/

This panel event provides insight into the world of journalism and trauma and the role that trauma plays in the life of the journalist, who may encounter highly charged emotional events and distressing images on a regular basis. What coping mechanisms are used when a journalist is confronted with such experiences? What are the costs of succeeding in a career where trauma and its aftermath are experienced and witnessed by those who bring the news to our television screens, newspaper front pages and social media feeds? Drawing on the first hand experiences of senior journalists, this event brings together journalism and psychoanalysis to explore the complex and difficult relationships between trauma and journalism in the late modern world.

Speakers include

Gavin Rees

Director of the Dart Centre for Journalism and Trauma

Helen Long, Reuters News Editor, Producer and Journalist

in conversation with

Sally Weintrobe, Psychoanalyst

Chair :

Stephen Jukes, Professor of Journalism, Bournemouth University.

Followed by Drinks Reception, 8-9pm.

The event is organised by Bournemouth University

in collaboration with the Freud Museum, the Media and the Inner World research network and Dart Centre Europe.

Speaker Biographies

Stephen Jukes is Professor of Journalism at Bournemouth University’s Faculty of Media & Communication, one of the largest of its kind in Europe with an international reputation for combining research, teaching and professional practice. His research focuses on areas of objectivity and emotion in news with an emphasis on trauma and conflict journalism. He was previously a foreign correspondent and editor at the international news agency Reuters. During a series of overseas postings he covered or oversaw coverage of stories ranging from the ousting of Margaret Thatcher to the fall of the Berlin Wall, two Gulf Wars and September 11. In his final position at Reuters, he was Global Head of News and executive editor for a series of books on the Middle East conflict. He chairs the Dart Centre for Journalism & Trauma in Europe and is a trustee of the Institute for War & Peace Reporting.

Helen Long is a seasoned Reuters Television journalist with nearly 20 years of experience covering breaking news around the globe. Prior to joining Reuters in 1997, she spent several years studying the socio-economic costs of anti-personnel mines in the world’s heaviest mined countries on behalf of the International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL), a global coalition of civic organizations that succeeded in pushing through the International Mine Ban Treaty in 1997, earning the ICBL and its founding coordinator, Jody Williams, the Nobel Peace Prize. Based in London, Helen is a trade unionist and leads the Reuters NUJ chapel. She is deeply concerned about the effects of trauma on journalists covering conflict and disaster in the field as well as the more recent and pressing issue of vicarious trauma in the newsroom, stemming from the explosive proliferation of graphic user-generated content (UGC). In 2015, she developed new social media guidelines aimed at mitigating the risks of secondary trauma among journalists working with violent imagery and initiated a Peer Support Network, which provides a complementary source of help, advice and information to Reuters journalists and freelancers around the world.

Gavin Rees, a journalist and filmmaker, is the director of Dart Centre Europe. The Dart Centre is a project of the Graduate School of Journalism at Columbia University in New York and is dedicated to promoting ethical and innovative approaches to the coverage of trauma and violence. Gavin is responsible for implementing the Centre’s work across Europe, and runs workshops and discussion groups on trauma awareness, resilience and interviewing skills for working journalists and journalism students in a range of countries around the world. Gavin has also produced business and political news for US, British and Japanese news channels, and has worked on drama and documentary films for the BBC, Channel 4 and independent film companies. As a visiting fellow in the Media School at Bournemouth University, Gavin is involved in academic research on how journalists report on violence, and he is a board member of the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies and the UK Psychological Trauma Society.

Sally Weintrobe is a psychoanalyst who writes and talks on how to understand what underlies our widespread disavowal of climate change. She edited and contributed to Engaging with Climate Change (2012). Her current work is on the culture of ‘uncare’, a culture that she argues works to sever our felt caring links with the environment and with each other (see www.sallyweintrobe.com). She is a Fellow of the British Psychoanalytical Society, a Chartered Clinical Psychologist and a founding member of the Climate Psychology Alliance.

May 19, 2014

Dragons’ Den: Pitch to the Editors

BU research, PG research, Research news Sally Gates

Do you have a science news story worthy of appearing in Nature, The Times or Research Fortnight?

Organisers of the UK Conference of Science Journalists are running a ‘Dragons’ Den: Pitch to the Editors’ session, open to students, recent graduates or scientists with a great story.

This is your chance to stand up in front of top journalists and ‘sell’ your story idea. It can be about any aspect of science, as long as it is suitable for Nature, the Times or Research Fortnight. (Do make sure you research the publications before submitting)!

Successful applicants will pitch their story idea to Helen Pearson (Nature), Ehsan Masood (Research Fortnight) and Hannah Devlin (The Times) in front of a live audience at the conference on Wednesday 18th June in London.

For more information and details of how to apply, visit http://www.ukcsj.org/dragons-den.html. Applications are open until 23rd May.

If you would like to discuss your pitch, email Sally Gates (Research Communications Manager).

October 7, 2013

Journalism: New Challenges, free eBook published by CJCR

BU research, Featured, Publishing Einar Thorsen

The Centre for Journalism and Communication Research (CJCR) is pleased to announce the publication of Journalism: New Challenges, edited by Karen Fowler-Watt and Stuart Allan.

The free e-book is available to download as a PDF on the CJCR website, where you can also download each chapter as an individual PDF. We have also made the book available via Dropbox (http://j.mp/Journalism-New_Challenges).

Journalism: New Challenges contains 29 engaging chapters prepared by academics and journalists, in addition to an introduction by the co-editors Karen Fowler-Watt and Stuart Allan.

In seeking to identify and critique a range of the most pressing challenges confronting journalism today, this book examines topics such as:

the role of the journalist in a democratic society, including where questions of truth and free speech are concerned;
the changing priorities of newspaper, radio, television, magazine, photography, and online news organisations;
the political, economic and technological pressures on news and editorial independence;
the impact of digital convergence on the forms and practices of newsgathering and storytelling;
the dynamics of professionalism, such as the negotiation of impartiality and objectivity in news reports;
journalists’ relationships with their sources, not least where the ‘spin’ of public relations shapes what’s covered, how and why;
evolving genres of news reporting, including politics, business, sports, celebrity, documentary, war and peace journalism;
journalism’s influence on its audiences, from moral panics to the trauma of representing violence and tragedy;
the globalisation of news, including the role of international news agencies;
new approaches to investigative reporting in a digital era;
and the rise of citizen journalism, live-blogging and social media, amongst many others.

The chapters are written in a crisp, accessible style, with a sharp eye to the key ideas, concepts, issues and debates warranting critical attention. Each ends with a set of ‘Challenging Questions’ to explore as you develop your own perspective, as well as a list of ‘Recommended Reading’ to help push the conversation onwards.

May you discover much here that stimulates your thinking and, with luck, prompts you to participate in lively debate about the future of journalism.

Journalism: New Challenges

Edited by: Karen Fowler-Watt and Stuart Allan
Published by: Centre for Journalism & Communication Research, Bournemouth University

ISBN: 978-1-910042-01-4 [paperback]
ISBN: 978-1-910042-00-7 [ebook-PDF]
ISBN: 978-1-910042-02-1 [ebook-epub]

Tagged / journalism

BU project explores potential power of constructive journalism in Covid-19 aftermath

BU research tackles global challenges – Aftershock Nepal

BU research tackles global challenges – Media Action Against Rape (India)

BU academics publish UK election report within 10 days of vote

New report on the state of local news in the UK

BU Trauma and Journalism panel at The Freud Museum, Friday, 27 May, 6.30-8pm, Tickets still available!

Dragons’ Den: Pitch to the Editors

Journalism: New Challenges, free eBook published by CJCR

Other services

Don’t miss a post!

Recent posts

Search by Category

Research Information Network

UKRI

Tagged / journalism

Other services

Don’t miss a post!

Recent posts

Search by Category

Search by popular post topics