/ Full archive

ACORN Funding Workshop for Early Career Researchers

The current round of ACORN funding is open, and the closing date for applications is 30th October. For those considering applying, this workshop is for you!

Monday 21st October   15:00 – 17:00 at the Talbot Campus in the CREATE Lecture Theatre (Fusion)

The ACORN fund is internal to BU and is aimed at giving Early Career Researchers an opportunity to hone both application and project management skills and an opportunity to receive constructive feedback from the funding panel members. Details of the scheme are available in the Acorn Fund Policy and there is a separate ACORN Fund application form.

If you would like to attend the ACORN workshop, please email acorn@bournemouth.ac.uk.

BU Bridging Fund

In summer 2015, we launched the BU Bridging Fund Scheme which aims to provide additional stability to fixed-term researchers who often rely on short-term contracts usually linked to external funding. This situation may impact on continuity of employment and job security and can result in a costly loss of researcher talent for the institution.

The Scheme aims to mitigate these circumstances by redeploying the researcher where possible, or where feasible, by providing ‘bridging funding’ for the continuation of employment for a short-term (maximum three months and up to six months, in exceptional circumstances) between research grants. It is intended to permit the temporary employment, in certain circumstances, of researchers between fixed-term contracts at BU, for whom no other source of funding is available, in order to:

(a) encourage the retention of experienced and skilled staff, and sustain research teams and expertise;

(b) avoid the break in employment and career which might otherwise be faced by such staff;

(c) maximise the opportunity for such staff to produce high-quality outputs and/or research impact at the end of funded contracts/grants.

The Scheme was updated in 2019 to:

  1. Increase the potential bridging period to a maximum of six months in exceptional cases (from the max of three months as it is currently).
  2. Update the application criteria so that applications will only be considered when one of the following conditions has been met at the point of application:
      1. Sufficient external funding has been secured to retain the researcher but there is an unavoidable gap (usually up to three months, but up to six months can be considered) between funding.
      2. The researcher is named on a submitted application for research funding and the decision is pending with an outcome expected before the end of the bridging period.

To find out more about the scheme, including how to apply for bridging funding, see the scheme guidelines.

The Bridging Fund Scheme is an action from our Athena SWAN action plan (which aims to create a more gender inclusive culture at BU) and our EC HR Excellence in Research Award (which aims to increase BU’s alignment with the national Concordat to Support the Career Development of Researchers).

ADRC wins the Nutrition Resource of the Year at the 2019 Complete Nutrition Awards

The Nutrition Resource of the Year is made up of four resources called Nutrition and Dementia Care: A toolkit for health and care staff. The toolkit is to provide freely available resources to deliver person-centred nutritional care in the area of dementia. The toolkit has been used all over the UK and overseas, as far afield as Australia and is the WINNER of the 2019 CN Award for Nutrition Resource of the Year!

Both Professor Jane Murphy and Gill Hooper represented the team by attending the 2019 CN Award ceremony last Thursday 29th September in London.

In the photo: Gill Hooper (Research Assistant) and Professor Jane Murphy (Professor of Nutrition and Co-Director of ADRC)

The team that produced the toolkit includes Professor Jane Murphy, Gill Hooper (linked with the Greater Manchester Nutrition and Hydration programme), Dr Joanne Holmes and Caroline Jones.

 

In the photo: Caroline Jones, Dr Joanne Holmes and Professor Jane Murphy

 

 

 

 

 

 

The toolkit comprises:

  1. Eating and Drinking Well: Supporting People Living with Dementia workbook
  2. Eating and Drinking Well Training Video
  3. Eating and Drinking Well Nutrition leaflet
  4. Eating and Drinking Well with Dementia: A Guide for Care Staff

It is available to download for free on our specific ADRC training page, please visit: https://www.bournemouth.ac.uk/research/centres-institutes/ageing-dementia-research-centre/eating-drinking-well-dementia-toolkit.

Just launched!

We have just launched our new Eating and Drinking Well with Dementia: A Guide for Family Carers and Friends which will be available to download from the ADRC training page soon.

 Please visit our training page and spread the word of our training resources.

 

 

The CN Awards* provide the chance for all readers, advertisers and contributors of CN
Magazines to come together to recognise the achievements of those whose great work
has made a significant difference within the nutrition industry – whether an individual,
group or organisation. For further information about the CN Awards, visit: nutrition2me.com/cn-awards

*The annual CN Awards were launched in 2010 by Complete Media & Marketing Ltd. (CM2) – the publishers of Complete Nutrition (CN)
Magazines. CM2 do not endorse any particular individual’s, group’s, organisation’s or company’s products, services, resources, views or
opinions. For further details on the CN Awards, visit: nutrition2me.com/cn-awards

RKEDF – Good Clinical Practice ‘Lite’

On Tuesday 15th October, RDS are running a 2 hour workshop on the standards of Good Clinical Practice. If you’re running your own clinical research, or are planning to in the future then this workshop is for you.

This workshop is designed to ensure that Researchers are equipped to conduct clinical research in accordance with the international standard.

The workshop will cover other standards and regulations, roles in clinical research, participant eligibility and data collection, safety reporting and closing down your study.

By the end of this workshop you will have an understanding about:

  • The importance of protecting the rights, safety and wellbeing of research participants
  • The importance of ensuring that research data are reliable
  • The roles and responsibilities of those involved in clinical research
  • The different stages of the clinical research pathway

If you’re interested in attending then reserve your place via Organisational Development.

Re-Orientation Events for PGRs

These re-orientation events are your opportunity to receive Faculty and Doctoral College updates for the forthcoming academic year. You’ll also hear about the updates to the 2019-20 Researcher Development Programme and a reminder of support services available to you throughout BU. You’ll be asked to consider research ethics during and towards the end of your research degree and there will be a bite-size effective researcher session appropriate to each re-orientation stage.

Pre-Major Review Re-Orientation

Tuesday 8 October – 9.30 – 1pm – Lansdowne

This re-orientation will also include a preparation session for the Major Review.

Register here.

Post-Major Review (Transfer) Re-Orientation

Tuesday 15 October – 10.00 -1.30pm – Lansdowne

This re-orientation will also include a preparation session for the Viva Voce examination.

Register here.

I look forward to seeing you at one of these bespoke sessions.

Natalie
(Reasearch Skills & Development Officer)
pgrskillsdevelopment@bournemouth.ac.uk

NEW ARTICLE The impact of online reputation on profitability

NEW ARTICLE

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to quantify the impact of online customer reputation on financial profitability.

Design/methodology/approach

Online reputation is captured by extracting the most recurring textual themes associated with customer satisfaction and dissatisfaction, expressed within positive vs negative online guest reviews on Booking.com. Latent semantic analysis is used for textual analysis. Proxies of overall financial performance are manually constructed for the sample hotels, using financial data from the Financial Analysis Made Easy (FAME) database. Ordinary least squares is used to gauge the effect of online customer reputation on financial profitability.

Findings

Empirical findings indicate that recurring textual themes from positive online reviews (in contrast to negative reviews) exhibit a higher degree of homogeneity and consensus. The themes repeated in positive, but not in negative reviews, are found to significantly associate with hotel financial performance. Results contribute to the discussion about the measurable effect of online reputation on financial performance.

Originality/value

Contemporary quantitative methods are used to extract online reputation for a sample of UK hotels and associate this reputation with bottom-line financial profitability. The relationship between online reputation, as manifested within hotel guest reviews, and the financial performance of hotels is examined. Financial profitability is the result of revenues, reduced by the costs incurred in order to be able to offer a given level of service. Previous studies have mainly focused on basic measures of performance, i.e. revenue generation, rather than bottom-line profitability. By combining online guest reviews from travel websites (Booking.com) with financial measures of enterprise performance (FAME), this study makes a meaningful contribution to the strategic management of hotel businesses.

Keywords

QR GCRF Fund opens for applications 4th October – Deadline 11th November

The latest round of an internal competition to allocate BU’s Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) grant opens 4th October 2019 with deadline for applications of 11th November 2019.

Bournemouth University receives an annual block grant funding from Research England to undertake research as part of the Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) that is an integral part of the UK’s Official Development Assistance (ODA) commitment. At BU this funding will once again be allocated via an open competition in accordance with BU QR GCRF three-year institutional strategy. The aim is to support a diverse portfolio of research activities with the common feature that they all in some way address the challenges defined for developing countries in the UN Sustainable Development Goals (the SDGs).

Funding available:

The GCRF Panel on behalf of the University are pleased to formally announce the 2019/2020 call for GCRF funded projects with three scheme pathways available to applicants. Prospective applicants should consult extensively the BU GCRF funding call specification for guidance on eligibility, available funding and requirements.  There is funding of £216,000 available over the period 1 January 2020 to 31 July 2021 and this will be allocated across the three schemes based on merit.   Whilst all three schemes can involve any DAC-listed countries, the primary focus must be on the participation of and benefits to LDCs and LICs in South Asia and Africa.

The three schemes are:

Scheme 1: GCRF New Project Awards
It is intended to support well-defined research projects enabling BU researchers to collaborate with, and bring benefits to, DAC listed countries.

Scheme 2: GCRF Project Cluster/Network Awards
The scheme will support well-defined applications that develop GCRF research clusters/networks utilising a minimum of two GCRF recognised projects (funded through BU or external GCRF funds ) and seek to directly enhance the depth and breadth of ODA-compliant impact.

Scheme 3: GCRF Project Cluster/Network Awards

The scheme will support well-defined applications that develop GCRF research clusters/networks utilising a minimum of two GCRF recognised projects (funded through BU or external GCRF funds ) and seek to directly enhance the depth and breadth of ODA-compliant impact.

Application process

Applications are welcome from academic and research staff from any faculty or department at BU. For staff on fixed-term contracts, their existing employment contract must outlast the duration of the project. All activity must be ODA eligible and fit both the BU priority objectives and the overall aim of GCRF (indicated in the section ‘Purpose of Funding’). This call aims to fund new projects. The GCRF panel expects that, wherever possible, applications will be headed by PIs who do not hold existing GCRF grants. PIs of existing GCRF grants are eligible to apply for Scheme 2 ONLY but proposals must clearly demonstrate how it expands and innovates from the existing projects and the new distinctive impacts they intend to create.

To apply, colleagues must complete the proposal form (annex 1). The deadline for submissions is 5 pm (GMT) on 8 November 2019. Successful applicants will receive notification by 6 December 2019. Completed application forms should be sent to Rhyannan Hurst, Panel Clerk (GCRF@bournemouth.ac.uk ). A full economic costing is not necessary.

 

 

 

 

ACORN Funding – Current and Previous Award Holders

As BU Early Career Researchers apply for the current round of ACORN funding, it is timely to remember and celebrate the current and previous award holders.

If you are interested in applying for this internal funding call, please refer to the the launch blog post. The introductory session which took place on 25th September is being repeated, due to popular demand.

The ACORN Fund panel members are looking forward to reviewing the applications to this third round.

Engaging with the media – scary or essential?

Wonkhe have an excellent new blog out: Why aren’t there more academic experts in the media?

Written by Justin Shaw, a HE Consultant at Communications Management, it is part of his campaign to ensure the academic voice is heard. He would like to see a proliferation in colleagues sharing their evidence-based expertise both with policy makers and the population.

For the blog Justin interviewed 30 of the most prolific ‘media active’ academics to understand the enablers and barriers in taking up media opportunities and what they would say to media-hesitant colleagues to help them take the next step.

Here are some excerpts – but do make time to read the full (short) blog:

The belief that it is far better to anticipate, lead, and take control of media opportunities (rather than suffer in response or serve as a moaning bystander) is one of the main findings that has emerged from interviews with some of the UK’s most committed “media active” academics.

A significant finding is that these academic media advocates simply now regard working with journalists as part of the job. Not only that, but they also stress that it is now (more than ever) a duty and an obligation – especially in an era of growing media input from the subjective and the “ill-informed” (most commonly defined as: shoot-from-the-hip politicians or rent-a-quote personalities drawn from reality TV shows).

While their journey as a go-to media expert has been challenging, and certainly there are some hard lessons to learn on the way, they say that we have now come to a point where academics just have to be bolder, must stand-up and project their knowledge, their evidence, their experience, and they must simply just seize the initiative. Without taking this stand then academics will be crowded out as the voices of reason

“So often politicians and policy-makers present things as facts, but there’s no evidence base for this, so I feel obliged to point out that there is a big body of work and evidence that isn’t being drawn upon, just being the critical voice to say “have you thought about the implications of what you are saying?”. The value of it is that it allows the public to have a more rounded view of the situation, so they can make their own minds up, based on evidence.”

The blog goes on to explain that the skills of an academic researcher and lecturer are the best type of skills to prepare for media engagement. So in short, you’re already got it in the bag.

The blog concluded by considering how the professional services teams around the academic, such as BU’s Press Office, BU’s RDS Impact and Research Comms colleagues, and BU’s Policy Team, can be useful additional support mechanisms – both for media experienced and novice colleagues. Get in touch if you’d like more support or to discuss how you could connect with the media or parliament.

A Fantastic Global Experience on the Way! Round tables with Global Connections- 6 th December 2019😇 From 2pm – 3.30 pm

This post is correct the mistake in yesterday’s post. The date of the event is 6th December 2019 and not October.

Dr Kaouther Kooli, Dr Hiroko Oe, Dr Elvira Bolat and Ediz Akcay will be running simulations round tables with B2B firms from Dorset and Tunis. we will be exploring with two groups of firms from each country how deep transformations have changed the firms taking part in the round table. Details are as follow:
Dr Kaouther Kooli, Dr Hiroko Oe and Ediz Akcay (ECR)will be running the round tables with B2B firms in Tunis and they have already arranged a room with the necessary equipments.
Dr Elvira Bolat and Emre Arslan, will be in a room equiped with skype (Room TBC).
Academics and PGRs from BU are very welcome to participate and provide any comments. Please feel free to email Kaouther on :kkooli@bournemouth.ac.uk.
Details about the session will posted on Research Blog soon.
This round table is on the first day of the conference duration ‘ Deep Transformations and the Future of Organisations’. The conference is organised by BU and other international universities, where Kaouther represents BU as an organiser and Kaouther, Hiroko and Ediz will chair the sessions during the conference.

NERC standard grants – internal competition extended

NERC introduced demand management measures in 2012. These were revised in 2015 to reduce the number and size of applications from research organisations for NERC’s discovery science standard grant scheme. Full details can be found in the BU policy document for NERC demand management measures available here.

As at January 2019, BU has been capped at one application per standard grant round. The measures only apply to NERC standard grants (including new investigators). An application counts towards an organisation, where the organisation is applying as the grant holding organisation (of the lead or component grant). This will be the organisation of the Principal Investigator of the lead or component grant.

BU process

As a result, BU has introduced a process for determining which application will be submitted to each NERC Standard Grant round. This will take the form of an internal competition, which will include peer review. The next available standard grant round is 14th January 2020. The deadline for internal Expressions of Interest (EoI) which will be used to determine which application will be submitted has been extended until 11th October 2019.  The EoI form, BU policy for NERC Demand Management Measures and process for selecting an application can be found here: I:\RDS\Public\NERC Demand Management 2020.

NERC have advised that where a research organisation submits more applications to any round than allowed under the cap, NERC will office-reject any excess applications, based purely on the time of submission through the Je-S system (last submitted = first rejected). However, as RDS submit applications through Je-S on behalf of applicants, RDS will not submit any applications that do not have prior agreement from the internal competition.

Following the internal competition, the Principal Investigator will have access to support from RDS, and will work closely with Research Facilitators and Funding Development Officers to develop the application. Access to external bid writers will also be available.

Appeals process

If an EoI is not selected to be submitted as an application, the Principal Investigator can appeal to Professor Tim McIntyre-Bhatty, Deputy Vice-Chancellor. Any appeals must be submitted within ten working days of the original decision. All appeals will be considered within ten working days of receipt.

RDS Contacts

Please contact Lisa Andrews, RDS Research Facilitator – andrewsl@bournemouth.ac.uk or Jo Garrad, RDS Funding Development Manager – jgarrad@bournemouth.ac.uk if you wish to submit an expression of interest.

 

Colombian government’s Truth Commission accepts BU’s GCRF – funded animation project as testimony

Their voices. Their stories. Their animation!

This was the mantra for a peace and reconciliation project, funded by the Global Challenges Research Fund, which CEMP’s Dr Karen Fowler-Watt (FMC) has just spent a week in Bogota disseminating to politicians, journalists, academics and NGOs.  There she joined former BU academic and journalist Dr Mathew Charles, now based in Colombia, who directed the project’s key output: an animated film made by young people from the indigenous Nasa community of Jambalo in the Cauca region who were caught up in the violence of Colombia’s 55-year civil conflict. The film was created in a series of workshops in their community – described in more detail below – and then, once complete, in mid-September they travelled to Bogota to screen their work and to share their stories of lived experience. It was an incredibly humbling and poignant experience, particularly as Colombia’s peace is once again fragile.

The most important – and potentially impactful – visit was to the Colombian government’s Truth Commission, where we screened the film and the young film makers talked about their experiences of conflict – some as ex-combatants. We also visited a children’s refuge where they shared their stories with a group of children and young people who have all been caught up in the violence, many are orphans. Screenings at Los Andes University, with a discussion about whether the combination of traditional forms of storytelling and new technologies constitutes a ‘new journalism’ followed, with the premiere in a cool indie cinema in Bogota, attended by the Senator for indigenous people, Feliciano Valencia.  We also hosted intergenerational workshops. where we explored routes to peace and reconciliation, using the film as a starting point for the discussion. Mathew Charles wrote this description of the production process for Changing the Story: https://changingthestory.leeds.ac.uk where he also elaborates on the impact of the project The Tree of Love. Resilience, Resistance and Reconciliation Among Former Child Soldiers in Colombia.

“Maybe you won’t know, but I’m going to tell you the truth about what war did to my community,” says A’te, a young girl staring into the flames of the Tulpa. The Tulpa is part of an ancient Nasa storytelling tradition, which invites us to share experiences with our friends and neighbours.

A’te is accompanied by her friend, Sek.

“When I was born, war had appeared long before,” he says.

“I remember when death entered my home without permission, without even bothering to knock at the door,”A’te continues. “Our loved ones were recruited by armed groups for no reason and for no cause.”

This conversation between teenagers Sek and A’te constitutes one of the early scenes of The Tree of Love or El Árbol del Amor, a short film written, illustrated and animated by child survivors of conflict in Colombia. It explores the complex phenomenon of forced recruitment and the life of child soldiers both inside and outside insurgent groups.

Led by a team of researchers and practitioners from Bournemouth University and in partnership with the Norwegian Refugee Council, Fondación Fahrenheit 451 and Tyet, The Tree of Love is a project, which involved a series of three workshops with 25 children and young people between the ages of 9 and 24 (some of whom were ex-combatants) from the indigenous Nasa reservation of Jambaló in Cauca, southwestern Colombia. The project was funded by a grant from the Global Challenges Research Fund.

The project recently featured on the front page of one of Colombia’s biggest dailies, El Espectador, which included a podcast dedicated to the film. It has also been accepted by Colombia’s Truth Commission as official testimony. The Commission was created as part of the 2016 peace deal with the FARC guerrilla and has a three-year mandate to build a picture of the country’s past violence.

The Nasa people have lived with Colombia’s bloody conflict for the past 55 years. Hundreds of Nasa youngsters are among the estimated 17,000 Colombian children and teenagers, recruited and utilised by the myriad of armed actors in the country.

In the animation, Sek (which means Sun in Nasa Yuwe, the indigenous language of the Nasa people) and A’te (which means Moon), explain their decision to take up arms and become guerrilla fighters. The pair are fictional characters, but their stories are real, constructed from the testimonies elicited from the former child combatants and young survivors of conflict.

In seeking to access these stories, it was important to avoid the idea of ‘giving voice’, which despite the nobility of its aim, can perpetuate hierarchies and ‘top down’ approaches to storytelling.  Vietnamese filmmaker, Trinh Min Ha stresses the imperative of ‘speaking nearby’ rather than ‘speaking about’, but our aim was to get even closer and listen from within, not as a member of the community, but as part of it.

We immersed ourselves in Jambaló, sharing the community’s customs and traditions.

The decision not to use interviews as a methodological tool was key to this concept and what we might call ‘story listening’, instead of ‘storytelling’. The participants created their own stories through the production of artefacts: drawings, writing stories and poetry, culminating in their own animation.

As academics and filmmakers, we became listeners and facilitators of this shared narrative space, while the workshop participants became the storytellers.

As a result, the film is intended to sow the seeds of social inclusion and reconciliation. We saw how sharing stories can illuminate personal experience and understanding, and can create a sense of community and belonging.

We also discovered how the act of storytelling can convert resilience and the ability to recover from ‘difficulty’ into personal forms of resistance and ‘push-back’, in which a refusal to accept or comply with ‘difficulty’ emerges.

Through this concept of resistance, the structures, which underpin marginalisation and violence are identified and brought into question, but perhaps more importantly, they are also communicated to others in the pursuit of peace and reconciliation and in the hope of inspiring or provoking change.

The programme of three five-day workshops to produce the animation took place between September and December 2018. The first sessions involved autobiographical narrative and storytelling exercises and they introduced the young participants to basic animation using Adobe Photoshop and After Effects. Some of the early work produced can be viewed here.

The second workshop focused on the development of the final script and the completion of a detailed storyboard. The third concentrated on illustration and animation, and also included sound recording and sound design.

Since the workshops, the Nasa community has created its own production company, using the training and equipment provided as part of our project. They are now working with their first clients.

The film is also being used as and advocacy tool by two civil society organisations: Taller de Vida and Creciendo Unidos.

Colombian Senator, Feliciano Valencia, spoke at our recent premiere at Cine Tonalá in the Colombian capital, Bogotá:

“When we talk about conflict, we do it as journalists, academics and lawyers,” he said. “But here the young people from Cauca are telling their own story, the way they choose to tell it.”

And their message, as articulated by A’te in the final scene of The Tree of Love, is clear: “I wish that through these narratives, children or adults from different places will understand what we live through, and that they won’t judge us, and that with this story, those who make war will listen to us,” she says.

 

The first UK preview screening of The Tree of Love will take place at a Journalism Education Research Group symposium organised by Karen Fowler-Watt for BU’s Centre of Excellence in Media Practice (CEMP) at the EBC 4-6pm on Thursday October 10th, 2019. This is part of the EdD conference. All are welcome.

Here is a sneak preview of the film

Research team for the GCRF-funded project ‘Child Survivors of Colombia’s armed conflict: Animation as a vehicle for reconciliation’:

Professor Stephen Jukes

Dr Mathew Charles

Dr Karen Fowler-Watt

Dr Paula Callus

Dr Stephanie Schwandner-Sievers

 

Photo of the week: ‘Environmental impact of the Rohingya refugee crisis in a photo’

Telling a story of research through photography

The ‘photo of the week’ is a weekly series featuring photographs taken by BU academics and students for our Research Photography Competition which took place earlier this year.

These provide a snapshot into some of the incredible research taking place across the BU community. 

This week’s photo of the week was taken by Mehidi Chowdhury and is titled;

‘Environmental impact of the Rohingya refugee crisis in a photo’

‘The photo has been taken during my visit to the Kutupalong Rohingya refugee camp, Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. The Kutupalong camp is the largest refugee camp in the world hosting more than half a million refugees. The visit funded by BU’s Global Challenges Research Fund took place in August 2018; one year after the latest mass exodus of Rohingya people from Myanmar to Bangladesh. The environmental impact of the crisis is visibly devastating. Forest areas have been cleared to make shelters for refugees. No large trees, birds and animals can be seen. I saw some Rohingya and local Bangladeshi settlements side by side. The demarcation is clear: Bangladeshi settlements are covered with trees and Rohingya settlements are not. The photo captures just that’

If you have any questions about the Photo of the Week series or the Research Photography Competition please email research@bournemouth.ac.uk