Category / BU research

Using AI to build a ‘Database from Below’: reflections on collecting, coding and quantifying media reports. 15 April at 2pm on Zoom

You are warmly welcomed to this week’s research process seminar.

Using AI to build a ‘Database from Below’: reflections on collecting, coding and quantifying media reports

Experimenting with Google Notebook LM to blueprint a workflow for coding and quantifying verified information from media and organisational reports, our ‘database from below’ prototype draws from participatory media data initiatives. In this research process presentation, I will provide some background context on these data-driven initiatives and then introduce how we are attempting to use Notebook LM software to transform unstructured humanitarian and media reports into quantifiable and comparable data. Here I’ll address ethical and practical challenges, as well as opportunities.  The methods and workflow I introduce could be applied to any project seekingto curate and investigate an evidence-base using scattered media and other text-based sources. The workflow is co-designed with and for budget and time-strapped stakeholders, to work quickly and affordably, without the need for specialised coding.

Speaker bio

Professor Anna Feigenbaum is an internationally recognised expert and innovator in the fields of digital media and data storytelling, specialising in health and science communications. Her research has been funded by Google, CancerUK, the NHS, UKRI, the Wellcome Trust, British Academy, the US Embassy, and the United Nations. She is author of 50+ peer review books, chapters and articles, including Tear Gas (Verso 2017) and The Data Storytelling Workbook (Routledge 2020). She regularly leads data storytelling trainings for the NHS, local councils, NGOs and universities around the world. Her work also reaches wider audiences through public engagement and media activities.

About the research process seminar series:

The purpose of this research seminar series is different to your typical research seminar and conference presentation. Instead of presenting the results and outcomes of research, we want to share good practices around the process of doing research. This might often involve a focus on research methods but it also includes aspects of publishing, writing, time management, career management etc.

The idea here is that the speaker takes us through the anatomy of the project or approach focussing particularly on the process – the challenges, the successes, and the failures. For the audience, we walk away with a practical application of a method or approach we may not be familiar with or may not have applied in this way before. Our ambition is to make us all better researchers as a result.

15 April at 2pm on Zoom

Please register here: https://bournemouth-ac-uk.zoom.us/meeting/register/_uKDKmLyT7OdSSHev1AjLQ

And if you can’t make it but would like the recording then please register and i will send you it.

 

BU research on road network efficiency reported in Times of India

international

BU research , led by PhD graduate Dr. Assemgul Kozhabek and Dr. Wei Koong Chai, on characterising efficiency of road networks in big populous cities around the world was covered by the Times of India, the world’s largest selling English-language daily in the world. The article reported the findings from BU’s work, specifically highlighted its insights into the structure, properties and efficiency of road networks in relevant cities in India.

 

Article: “Study rates ‘efficiency’ of city road network” March 17 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/ahmedabad/study-rates-efficiency-of-city-road-network/articleshow/119086477.cms.

 

BU collaborates with University of Exeter on modelling innovation adoption

innovation, open access, Publishing

Bournemouth University (BU) has collaborated with the University of Exeter on modelling innovation adoption diffusion. The work, led by Dr. Wei Koong Chai in BU, draw on the epidemic theory and model the diffusion dynamics considering (1) the role of network structures in dictating the spread of adoption and (2) how individual’s characteristic/capability influences the path of diffusion (e.g. an individual may have different attitude or ability towards adopting a new innovation). A positive adoption decision is related to the number of neighbors adopting the innovation. The neighbors decisions are, in turn, dependent on their own neighbors and so, it forms a complex cascading inter-dependent relationship between the different individuals in the network. As such, each node in the network is unique and its relevant adoption rate must be considered separately conditioned with the activities occurring in the network over time.

The model offers insights into how the network spectrum affects the innovation exposure rate and spreading of innovation individually and across communities with different adoption behaviours. It also illustrates the effects of the embedded social structure and the characteristics of individuals in the network on the path of innovation diffusion via two use cases: (i) innovation adoption of EU countries in a Single Market Programme and (ii) innovation adoption of specific class of technology (specifically financial technologies (FinTech)).

 

Reference:

Duanmu, JL., Chai, W.K. Modelling innovation adoption spreading in complex networks. Appl Netw Sci 10, 10 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-025-00698-8

 

 

BU Researchers Pioneering Green Hydrogen Production through OcenGen Startup

A team of innovative researchers from Bournemouth University (BU) is making waves in the sustainable energy sector through their pioneering startup project, OcenGen. Focused on green hydrogen production, OcenGen aims to develop next-generation low-cost, high-performance electrocatalysts that could drastically reduce the dependence on expensive and scarce platinum-group metals currently used in conventional water electrolysers.

This ground-breaking project has recently been selected to join Cohort 8 at Conception X, which runs the leading cross-university programme dedicated to launching and accelerating deeptech ventures created by PhD researchers.

At the core of OcenGen’s innovation is the development of advanced electrocatalytic materials using earth-abundant transition metals, designed to work efficiently under mildly alkaline and seawater conditions. This makes the technology an ideal fit for Anion Exchange Membrane (AEM) electrolysers, offering a cost-effective and scalable alternative to the Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) systems, which heavily rely on iridium and other rare metals.

Shadeepa Karunarathne, PhD researcher at BU and founder of OcenGen, shared his excitement:“We are thrilled to be part of the Conception X journey. This marks a significant milestone in translating our laboratory research into commercial reality. Our catalyst technology has the potential to revolutionise the green hydrogen sector by reducing material costs and enabling large-scale, sustainable hydrogen generation.”

Shadeepa further added, “Our work aligns closely with the UK’s Net Zero goals by 2030 and contributes toward the transition to clean energy. By enabling hydrogen production directly from seawater without costly desalination, we also offer a more sustainable path forward for offshore and coastal applications.”

The technology developed at OcenGen leverages cutting-edge material engineering techniques, including facet engineering and orbital occupancy tuning to optimise oxygen evolution kinetics. The team is also integrating machine learning algorithms to accelerate catalyst discovery and process optimisation with fewer physical experiments.

Supporting this effort, Associate Professor Amor Abdelkader, a renowned materials scientist and Shadeepa’s PhD supervisor, who serves as a senior advisor to the project, stated:
“This is a timely and impactful innovation. The OcenGen technology demonstrates how research excellence can be translated into practical solutions to address pressing global energy challenges. I’m proud to support a project that bridges fundamental science and commercial potential so effectively.”

The core OcenGen team includes Dr. Chirag Ratwani, Co-founder and expert in 2D materials and business strategy, and Eshani Fernando, AI Scientist responsible for integrating data-driven approaches for catalyst optimisation.

The team also extended their thanks to Michael Board, Research Manager and Facilitator, for his continued encouragement and support for innovation and entrepreneurship among BU’s PhD researchers.“Michael’s leadership in fostering a startup mindset within academia is truly commendable and has been instrumental in motivating us to pursue this venture,” said Shadeepa.

OcenGen now welcomes funding opportunities and collaborative partnerships to accelerate development and commercial deployment.

Get in touch to join our mission in driving the future of green hydrogen.

🔗 Staff Profile 🔗 LinkedIn

Author: Shadeepa Karunarathne

Paper on Nepal reaching 5,000 readers

international, open access, Publishing, Women's Academic Network, writing

Today ResearchGate informed us that our 2010 paper ‘Women’s autonomy in household decision-making: A demographic study in Nepal‘ [1] has been read 5,000 times.  This academic paper published in the international journal Reproductive Health is Open Access, hence available to anybody globally with internet access. The study explored the links between women’s household position in Nepal and their autonomy in decision making.  Using existing data (n = 8,257)  from the Nepal Demographic Health Survey (NDHS) 2006 we (Dr. Pramod Regmi and Prof. Edwin van Teijlingen with colleagues from other UK universities) focused on four types of household decision making: (1) women’s own health care; (2) making major household purchases; (3) making purchase for daily household needs; and (4) visits to her family or relatives.

We found that women’s autonomy in decision making is positively associated with their age, employment and number of living children. Women from rural area and Terai region (the southern part of Nepal bordering India) have less autonomy in decision making in all four types of outcome measure. There is a mixed variation in women’s autonomy in the development region across all outcome measures. Western women are more likely to make decision in own health care (1.2-1.6), while they are less likely to purchase daily household needs (0.6-0.9). Women’s increased education is positively associated with autonomy in own health care decision making (p < 0.01), however their more schooling (school-leaving certificate and above) shows non-significance with other outcome measures. Interestingly, rich women are less likely to have autonomy to make decision in own healthcare.

 

Reference:

  1. Acharya, D.R., Bell, J.S., Simkhada, P., van Teijlingen, E., Regmi, P. (2010) Women’s autonomy in household decision-making: a demographic study in Nepal. Reproductive Health 7, 15   https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-7-15

Speaker @ NLP Healthcare Summit 2025: Evaluating LLMs in Understanding Image Series Textual Narratives

international

📢 This is a short and final notice that already today 02 April 2025 I am going to showcase the advances made a part of Marking Medical Images with NLP at Bournemouth University and National Centre for Computer Animation, Bournemouth University at NLP Healthcare Summit 2025.

🗓️ Save an event in Google Calendar: https://lnkd.in/eHfMyRUk
⏲️ Time: 8.10 PM (Europe / London Timezone)

🙌 Feel free to join and ask me any related questions

> What is going to be about?
> We overview the problem of extracting image series acquisition aspects from short text medical reports in the domain of HCC liver cancer imaging. Our focus is to evaluate performance of various stock LLM model in out-of-the-box condition using instruction based approach. The goal is to answer the question: to what extent we can trust LLM for retrieving medical aspects and depending of the scale of LLM.

Dr. Nicolay Rusnachenko
Research Fellow at Centre For Applied Creative Technologies PLUS (CFACT+)
Bournemouth University

First paper by PhD student

NHS, open access, PG research, Publishing, student research, writing

We are delighted to announce that Bournemouth University (BU) and University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust (UHD) Clinical Match-Funded PhD researcher, Leila Kattach, has published her first academic paper. This milestone marks an important step in Leila’s research journey and highlights the impactful work being carried out within our clinical research community.
The paper, titled “Nurse-Led Models of Service Delivery for Skin Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review“, was published in the Journal of Advanced Nursing yesterday (April 1, 2025) [1]. This research consolidates evidence on nurse-led models for skin cancer detection, comparing their effectiveness to physician-led care and highlighting their potential benefits in terms of accessibility, cost-effectiveness, and patient satisfaction.
The systematic review, co-authored with Heidi Singleton, Steven Ersser, Debbie Holley, Ian Pearson, and Abdulrahman Shadeed, rigorously analyzed studies from 1992 to 2024, assessing the role of nurses in diagnosing, treating, and supporting skin cancer patients. The findings demonstrate that nurse-led models can complement or even substitute traditional physician-led care, offering high diagnostic accuracy, improved access to care, and enhanced patient education.
Key highlights from the study include:
Comparable diagnostic accuracy between nurses and ophthalmologists in skin cancer detection.
Increased accessibility and reduced waiting times for patients through community-based, nurse-led services.
Significant cost savings associated with nurse-led care delivery.
Patient preference for nurse-led models, citing convenience and enhanced education on self-examination.
The study also emphasizes the need for further research and standardized national guidelines to scale and integrate nurse-led models effectively into healthcare systems.
Leila’s research has strong implications for policy and clinical practice, advocating for:
✅ Enhanced dermatology nursing training to equip nurses with advanced skills in assessment, diagnosis, and treatment.
✅ Development of Dermatology Nurse Consultant Training Programmes to support professional development and independent practice.
✅ Support for community-based care to enhance accessibility, particularly in underserved regions.
✅ Standardization of nurse-led models to ensure consistency and high standards across healthcare settings.
Leila Kattach’s research has a PhD studentship jointly funded by BU and UHD NHS Foundation Trust. The study was conducted in collaboration with academic dermatology experts, specialist clinicians, and a patient representative with lived experience of melanoma, ensuring a patient-centered approach.  Leila’s work paves the way for further exploration into nurse-led service delivery models and their long-term impact on skin cancer care, cost-effectiveness, and healthcare workforce sustainability. We look forward to seeing how her research evolves and contributes to improving patient care in dermatology.
👏 Congratulations to Leila Kattach and the research team on this outstanding achievement!
Prof. Edwin van Teijlingen
Reference:
  1. Kattach, L., Singleton, H., Ersser, S., Holley, D., Pearson, I. & Shadeed, A. (2025), Nurse-Led Models of Service Delivery for Skin Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review. Journal of Advanced Nursing.[online first]  https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16854

 

Nepal Family Cohort Study dissemination event

international, open access, Publishing, writing

Colleagues working on our Nepal Family Cohort Study (NeFCoS) presented baseline data at a dissemination programme held today (March 28th) in Everest Hotel, Kathmandu.  Bournemouth University is a key partner in this unique long-term follow-up study in Nepal.  Our large international team is led by Dr. Om Kurmi, Associate Professor Research in the Centre for Healthcare and Communities at Coventry University.  The Bournemouth University (BU) team comprises Dr. Pramod Regmi (Principal Academic-International Health), Dr. Edwin van Teijlingen (Professor of Reproductive Health), Dr. Rebecca Neal (Principal Lecturer in Exercise Physiology) and Dr. Vanora Hundley (Professor of Midwifery).
The Nepal Family Cohort Study (NeFCoS) is a multidisciplinary cohort study into the prevalence, incidence, and determinants of various diseases from childhood to adulthood in children and their parents for over two decades.  NeFCoS is a longitudinal study which recently started collecting health and well-being data, and which will collect data repeatedly from the same individuals at certain intervals for years to come.
Today’s programme included a range of academics and policy-makers introducing aspects of the study and its preliminary findings.  Prof. Edwin van Teijlingen did a short presentation offering ‘Special Remarks on Midwifery, Maternal & Perinatal Health’.  To date we have published one academic paper in an Open Access journal on the research protocol of this work [1].
Reference:
  1. Kurmi, O.P., Chaudhary, N., Delanerolle, G., Bolton, C.E., Pant, P.R., Regmi, P., Gautam, S., Satia, I., Simkhada, P., Kyrou, I., Sigdel, T.K., Hundley, V., Dali, P.R., Lokke, A., Hubert Lam, K.B., Bennett, D., Custovic, A., van Teijlingen, E., Gill, P. Randeva, H., O’Byrne, P.M., and Nepal Family Cohort Collaborators Group, Nepal Family Cohort Study: A Study Protocol, BMJ Open 14:e088896. doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2024-088896

When is a ‘new’ paper no longer new?

BRIAN, open access, Publishing, writing

This week we had two new academic papers published online.  The first paper was an education one ‘PhD Progress and Transfer Vivas at Universities in the United Kingdom‘ [1] and the second focused on ‘Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of Masters Level Students in the COVID-19 Pandemic‘ [2].  The first paper clearly states “Article History: Received: 10 Jan 2024; Revised: 17 Feb 2024; Accepted: 26 Feb 2024”, the online information for the second paper states: “Published 2024-12-31”, i.e. both are clearly identified as 2024 papers.

The problem for the authors is that both only appeared online this week.  For example, today (27th March 2025) Nepal Journals Online (NepJoL) reports the publication of the latest issue of Education Quarterly, Volume 5 Issue 1, the one in which we published, as 24th March (see picture below).  The reason this happens is because the journal editors experienced problems in the past year and did not manage to publish an issue in the calendar year, which makes the publication history look less professional.  To avoid having a year missing the most recently published issue is given an official 2024 publication date.

In a world full of problems the minor inconvenience of papers being backdated is twofold for academic authors.  First, we can not really announce the publication of a a new Bournemouth University paper since the dated stamped on it is last year’s.  Secondly, paper can’t be used for the REF as the acceptance date is also set in the past, for papers to be acceptable for inclusion in REF 2029 typically papers need to be made available on Open Access within three months after the acceptance date .

 

Prof. Edwin van Teijlingen

Centre for Midwifery & Women’s Health

 

References:

  1. van Teijlingen, A., Marmion, V., Harvey, O., Regmi, P., van Teijlingen, E. (2024) PhD Progress and Transfer Vivas at Universities in the United Kingdom, Journal of Education and Research, 14(1): 104-116, https://doi.org/10.51474/jer/16196
  2. Pasa, R.B., Khanal, K.P., Khatri, B.B., Adhikari, D., Kharel, S., Sharma, M.K., van Teijlingen, E.R. (2024). Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of Masters Level Students on the COVID-19 Pandemic. Education Quarterly, 5(1): 53–72. https://doi.org/10.3126/jeqtu.v5i1.76745

New research evaluating a domestic abuse programme: A collaboration between BU & Yellow Door

A team at Bournemouth University have won funding to evaluate a holistic domestic abuse programme run by Yellow Door in Southampton, a domestic abuse charity. The Early Years Domestic Abuse Programme is run over a 10-week period for mothers/caregivers and their children (under 5 years) who have experienced domestic abuse. The interdisciplinary team at BU consists of Project Lead, Dr Jane Healy, Criminology, alongside colleagues in social work and psychology.

 

Chloe Gilbert, Head of Business Operations and Strategy at Yellow Door stated: “The course is run in 2 parts: the parents course covers the impact of domestic and sexual abuse, effective communication skills, working with challenging behaviour, developing protective behaviours and strategies for keeping mothers, children and young people safe. We then also run separate Thera-play sessions for the children delivered by a qualified Play Therapist. We are really looking forward to working with Bournemouth University to assess the impact of this important work”. 

 

Yellow Door extend their thanks to Rayne Foundation and Charles Hayward Foundation for their support. If you would like to find out more about the project which is running until 2027, please contact: Victoria at Yellow Door, at info@yellowdoor.org.uk.

Collaborative Decision Making

The other members of the research team have strong ties to this field of research having published widely in the areas of domestic abuse, gender-based violence and social work practice. They include Dr Terri Cole and Dr Orlanda Harvey, who will lead on work with professionals, and Dr Stefan Kleipoedszus and Dr Louise Oliver who will work with the children.  Dr Healy will work with the parents/carers, alongside Research Assistant Dr Anna Kopec Massey.

 

This research builds on previous work undertaken in collaboration with Yellow Door (Final Report for Yellow Door and Stop Domestic Abuse) and Harvey, Healy and Cole have previously evaluated domestic abuse services through a number of local and international projects (including: OSSPC “The Other Side of the Story : Perpetrators in Change “, Yellow Door and Stop Domestic Abuse) which have included interviews with adult victim-survivors and focus groups with professionals.

 

The evaluation will contribute substantially to understanding both the benefits and challenges to delivering an Early Years programme to adults and children. The evaluation will produce an evidence-base in relation to this specific programme, in the form of an open-access and accessible research report, published articles and conference presentations, and position it within wider national, international, practitioner and academic context. It will gather information from service users, including children, parent/carers, professionals and practitioners to provide an independent but holistic evaluation of the programme.

teamwork